Ecosyste.ms: Issues
An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.
GitHub / w3c/standards-track issues and pull requests
#32 - add link per issue #28
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by tantek 9 months ago
#31 - Updates for Director-free process changes, fix #30
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by svgeesus 9 months ago
#30 - Updates for Director-free process changes
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by svgeesus 9 months ago
#28 - needs a README with short summary and link to actual readable document
Issue -
State: open - Opened by tantek over 6 years ago
- 1 comment
#27 - volunteer as co-editor
Issue -
State: open - Opened by tantek over 6 years ago
#26 - fix: typo
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by marcoscaceres over 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#25 - Document and analyze obsolete RECs
Issue -
State: open - Opened by msporny over 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#24 - Incomplete sentence in ¶ "Is it clear the proposers are not seeking a rubber stamp from W3C?"
Issue -
State: open - Opened by stuartasutton over 7 years ago
#23 - definition of "aspirational" should be further clarified
Issue -
State: open - Opened by tantek over 7 years ago
- 2 comments
#22 - fix typo
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by tantek over 7 years ago
#21 - fix indentation in in favor list
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by wayneca over 8 years ago
#20 - duplicating request #11 in latest version
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by wayneca over 8 years ago
#19 - arguments against incubation - clarify one on team participation
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by wayneca over 8 years ago
- 2 comments
#18 - typo in "Clear RF licensing commitments?"
Issue -
State: open - Opened by wayneca over 8 years ago
#17 - "gaps in the patent commitment" needs to be clarified - suggesting CLA problem?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by wayneca over 8 years ago
#16 - problem statement downplays important WG roles
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by wayneca over 8 years ago
#15 - Reference W3C CG Charter template
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by wayneca over 8 years ago
#14 - target audience section doesn't include AC in decisions it shares with Director
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by wayneca over 8 years ago
- 1 comment
#13 - target audience - combine Director and AC bullets
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by wayneca over 8 years ago
#12 - correct typos
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by wayneca over 8 years ago
#11 - moving arguments made from the problem statement
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by chaals over 8 years ago
- 1 comment
#10 - Add team involvement to develop proposals
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by wseltzer over 8 years ago
#9 - contributors
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by tantek over 8 years ago
- 1 comment
#8 - what is restricted by the criteria: Charter? what WG can do before FPWD? publishing FPWD?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by wayneca over 8 years ago
- 1 comment
#7 - Wording of consensus based argument against mandatory incubation
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by wayneca over 8 years ago
- 1 comment
#6 - Clarify the stage at which screens apply
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by wseltzer over 8 years ago
- 3 comments
#5 - Should there be a proof of initial consensus?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by iherman over 8 years ago
- 4 comments
#4 - Rubber stamp should not be an 'additional consideration'
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by iherman over 8 years ago
- 1 comment
#3 - Role of the W3C staff and core process?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by iherman over 8 years ago
- 1 comment
#2 - We are not talking only about traditional Web Sites and browsers
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by iherman over 8 years ago
- 1 comment
#1 - User's community
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by iherman over 8 years ago
- 2 comments