Ecosyste.ms: Issues
An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.
GitHub / w3c/maturity-model issues and pull requests
#122 - Step 3: Outcomes from Rating to Outcome/Proof Points DIFF / MAPPING - Knowledge and Skills
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#121 - Step 2: Rating / Stages Update for Knowledge and Skills for Outcomes
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#120 - Step 1: Rating / Stages Update for Knowledge and Skills for Definitions
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#120 - Step 1: Rating / Stages Update for Knowledge and Skills for Definitions
Issue -
State: open - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#119 - Delete "3.2.1.3 Dimension Integration" from Knowledge and Skills
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#119 - Delete "3.2.1.3 Dimension Integration" from Knowledge and Skills
Issue -
State: open - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
#118 - Knowledge and Skills - Proof Point Updates
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#117 - Type "role based" to "role-based" 3.2.1.2
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#116 - Do we need to mention "employee and management" for 3.2.1.1
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#116 - Do we need to mention "employee and management" for 3.2.1.1
Issue -
State: open - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
#115 - Delete "Keeping skills up-to-date with current requirements" in 3.2.1.1 Assessing Current Skills to Identify and Address Gaps
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#115 - Delete "Keeping skills up-to-date with current requirements" in 3.2.1.1 Assessing Current Skills to Identify and Address Gaps
Issue -
State: open - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#114 - Delete word "current" in 3.2.1.1 Assessing Current Skills to Identify and Address Gaps
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#113 - Change Proof Point 2 for 3.2.1.1 Assessing Current Skills to Identify and Address Gaps
Issue -
State: open - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
#113 - Change Proof Point 2 for 3.2.1.1 Assessing Current Skills to Identify and Address Gaps
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma about 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#112 - Proposing adjusted structure for Outcomes, Proof Points, and Stages (back to previous proposal!)
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 3 comments
#111 - Outcomes not consistently written and not covering the intent of the Stage
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#110 - Relationship Outcomes for stages and Proof Points not clear
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#109 - Starting with the definition for each Dimension under 3. Accessibility Maturity Per Dimension
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#108 - Definitions for Maturity Stages too long
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 3 comments
#107 - Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#106 - Support definition needs a tweak, "internal employees" are not covering all employees...
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#105 - Definition Knowledge and Skills needs some adjustment
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#104 - Proof points = Written or tangible evidence, according to definition, not an 'or' / 'other' part / sub-section
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#103 - Where are the "Outcomes" in the Maturity Model Structure?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#102 - Proof Point definition to be adjusted to fit under an Outcome
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#101 - What do we mean with 'aspects'? Used in two ways i.c.w. 'dimensions'
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#100 - Remove "where the organization is doing accessibility well"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#99 - "Outcomes" missing in sentence while we build on this term
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#98 - 'Stages' or 'levels'?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#97 - delete one "levels" from sentence
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#96 - Which Methodology is the model referring to?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#95 - Assumption made that products are produced accessible, needs small adjustment
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#94 - rephrase sentence to make clear it is not about an "organization in accessibility practices"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#93 - Change "are accessible" to "are more accessible" in Abstract
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma over 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#91 - Proof points should include measures of the extent to which processes are successful
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jasonjgw over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#89 - ICT Development Lifecycle ratings outcomes aren't stated like the outcomes are in Silver
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by maryjom over 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#87 - 3.6.1 Proof Points for Procurement Section: Some bullets aren't clear what is needed
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by maryjom over 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#86 - Link to the worksheet needed from each dimension
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by maryjom over 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#85 - Inconsistencies in Inactive ratings for various dimensions
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by maryjom over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#83 - Section 3.7.2 Ratings for Evaluation - Culture: proof points vs. ratings mismatch
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by maryjom over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#81 - Section 3.4.1 Proof Points for ICT Development Lifecycle: Missing planning aspects
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by maryjom over 2 years ago
- 5 comments
#79 - Section 3.3.2 Rating for evaluation - Support: Outcomes for optimize stage don't align with proof points
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by maryjom over 2 years ago
- 3 comments
#78 - 3.3.2 Ratings for Evaluation - Support section: why is knowledge and skills mentioned?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by maryjom over 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#75 - Section 1.4: Add relevant research and standards
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by maryjom over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#52 - Section 2 (and elsewhere, if necessary): broaden the range of standards relevant to the maturity model.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by jasonjgw almost 3 years ago
- 1 comment
#43 - Should "proof points" and "ratings for evaluation" sections be combined for clarity?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jasonjgw almost 3 years ago
- 5 comments
#41 - Split definition for Culture in 2 sentences
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma almost 3 years ago
- 1 comment
#40 - Change Personnel definition
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma almost 3 years ago
- 1 comment
#39 - Change definition of K&S
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma almost 3 years ago
- 1 comment
#38 - Launch should not be dependent on "organization-wide."
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma almost 3 years ago
- 2 comments
#37 - Inactive is not "No awareness and recognition of need."
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma almost 3 years ago
- 1 comment
#36 - Adjust paragraph
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma almost 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: Editorial
#35 - "Stages based on proof points" not correct
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma almost 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: Editorial
#32 - Delete: "Figure 1 shows the core structure of the Maturity Model.'
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma almost 3 years ago
- 1 comment
#31 - " Dimensions include:" change to " Dimensions included:"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma almost 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: Editorial
#28 - No "Appendix" present for "1.3 Existing Research" (Delete?)
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma almost 3 years ago
- 2 comments
Labels: Editorial
#21 - Flow of "A Maturity Model is:" need a little bit of love
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jake-abma almost 3 years ago
- 2 comments
Labels: Editorial
#17 - The application of the model to decentralized organizations could be clarified, as could the nature and roles of the valid outputs of applying the model in an evaluation.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by jasonjgw almost 3 years ago
- 3 comments