Ecosyste.ms: Issues

An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.

GitHub / w3c/did issues and pull requests

#50 - Random capitalization of "key terms" ...those that appear in the Terminology section

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: editorial

#50 - Random capitalization of "key terms" ...those that appear in the Terminology section

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: editorial

#48 - Some comments by Steven Rowat

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: editorial, pending close

#48 - Some comments by Steven Rowat

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: editorial, pending close

#47 - Should "id" be mandatory for "service" and "publicKey"?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 7 comments
Labels: discuss

#47 - Should "id" be mandatory for "service" and "publicKey"?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 7 comments
Labels: discuss

#46 - It would be useful to have `services` as a mapping instead of an `array`

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: discuss, pending close

#46 - It would be useful to have `services` as a mapping instead of an `array`

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: discuss, pending close

#45 - Is method-specific-id supposed to be equivalent to param-char?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 8 comments
Labels: editorial, pending close

#45 - Is method-specific-id supposed to be equivalent to param-char?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 8 comments
Labels: editorial, pending close

#44 - DID Test Suite and untestable normative statements

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 4 comments
Labels: editorial, pending close

#44 - DID Test Suite and untestable normative statements

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 4 comments
Labels: editorial, pending close

#43 - [Introduction] Doesn't read well...

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: editorial

#43 - [Introduction] Doesn't read well...

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: editorial

#42 - [Introduction] Clarify...

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago
Labels: editorial

#42 - [Introduction] Clarify...

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago
Labels: editorial

#41 - [Introduction] Clarification...

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#41 - [Introduction] Clarification...

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#40 - [Abstract] Clarification...

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago
Labels: editorial

#40 - [Abstract] Clarification...

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago
Labels: editorial

#39 - [Absract] "proof purposes" is a new term but is not defined anywhere in the document

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: editorial, pr exists

#39 - [Absract] "proof purposes" is a new term but is not defined anywhere in the document

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: editorial, pr exists

#38 - [Abstract] Not sure of the intended meaning of the following sentence...

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago
Labels: editorial

#38 - [Abstract] Not sure of the intended meaning of the following sentence...

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago
Labels: editorial

#37 - Add "DID controller" to "Terminology" section.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: editorial

#37 - Add "DID controller" to "Terminology" section.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: editorial

#36 - Details on the use of method-specific DID parameters

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 16 comments
Labels: pending close

#36 - Details on the use of method-specific DID parameters

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 16 comments
Labels: pending close

#35 - Use colon separator or kebab-case for method-specific DID parameter names?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: discuss, pending close

#35 - Use colon separator or kebab-case for method-specific DID parameter names?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: discuss, pending close

#34 - Should DID syntax allow an empty "method-specific-id"?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 8 comments
Labels: discuss

#34 - Should DID syntax allow an empty "method-specific-id"?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 8 comments
Labels: discuss

#33 - Cheap DIDs and the option to migrate DIDs between ledgers using standard DID Deprecation Registries

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 43 comments
Labels: pending close

#33 - Cheap DIDs and the option to migrate DIDs between ledgers using standard DID Deprecation Registries

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 43 comments
Labels: pending close

#32 - Add section on services to data model section.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#32 - Add section on services to data model section.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#31 - Add section on cryptographic keys.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#31 - Add section on cryptographic keys.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#30 - Add initial text to DID Document section.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 2 comments

#30 - Add initial text to DID Document section.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 2 comments

#29 - Add section on identifiers to Data Model section.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#29 - Add section on identifiers to Data Model section.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#28 - Remove "Created" property section.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 19 comments
Labels: do not merge, metadata

#28 - Remove "Created" property section.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 19 comments
Labels: do not merge, metadata

#27 - Remove "Updated" property section.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 7 comments
Labels: do not merge, metadata

#27 - Remove "Updated" property section.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 7 comments
Labels: do not merge, metadata

#26 - Remove "Proof" property section.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 16 comments
Labels: do not merge

#26 - Remove "Proof" property section.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 16 comments
Labels: do not merge

#25 - (Partially) Encrypting DID Documents

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: editorial, pending close

#25 - (Partially) Encrypting DID Documents

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: editorial, pending close

#24 - make publicKey section more explicit for understanding of DIDs reliance on public keys

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 7 comments
Labels: discuss, pending close

#24 - make publicKey section more explicit for understanding of DIDs reliance on public keys

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 7 comments
Labels: discuss, pending close

#23 - publicKeyJwk, publicKeyHex, publicKeyBase64, publicKeyBase58 missing from context.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 18 comments
Labels: discuss, extensibility

#23 - publicKeyJwk, publicKeyHex, publicKeyBase64, publicKeyBase58 missing from context.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 18 comments
Labels: discuss, extensibility

#22 - [Authentication] Is Authentication the correct mechanism for specifying the ownership of a Thing?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: pending close

#22 - [Authentication] Is Authentication the correct mechanism for specifying the ownership of a Thing?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: pending close

#21 - [DID Operations] "all the operations required of a CKMS" are not specified on the body of this section

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: editorial, pending close

#21 - [DID Operations] "all the operations required of a CKMS" are not specified on the body of this section

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: editorial, pending close

#20 - [Public Keys] re: referenced keys: Is multiple level recursion allowed?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 7 comments
Labels: discuss, pending close

#20 - [Public Keys] re: referenced keys: Is multiple level recursion allowed?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 7 comments
Labels: discuss, pending close

#19 - [Design Goals] all references to *identifier* management etc. should be changed to *DID Entity* management, etc.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: discuss, pending close

#19 - [Design Goals] all references to *identifier* management etc. should be changed to *DID Entity* management, etc.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: discuss, pending close

#17 - [Overview] "Because DIDs reside on a distributed ledger" - not true?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: editorial

#17 - [Overview] "Because DIDs reside on a distributed ledger" - not true?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: editorial

#16 - Are service endpoints transport layer or application layer specific?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 15 comments
Labels: editorial

#16 - Are service endpoints transport layer or application layer specific?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 15 comments
Labels: editorial

#15 - need rationale in spec for fully qualified DID references as the value of "id" fields

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 19 comments
Labels: pending close

#15 - need rationale in spec for fully qualified DID references as the value of "id" fields

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 19 comments
Labels: pending close

#14 - Standardize the key revocation list

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 56 comments
Labels: pending close

#14 - Standardize the key revocation list

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 56 comments
Labels: pending close

#13 - Allow DID documents to be retrieved using any URI scheme

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: pending close

#13 - Allow DID documents to be retrieved using any URI scheme

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: pending close

#12 - DID Method discovery mechanism requirement

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: discuss

#11 - What happens when you feed a did: URL to a URL resolver?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: pending close

#10 - Explain RsaSignature2018

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 15 comments
Labels: pending close

#9 - Replace RsaSignature2017 by a standard JWA signature

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 8 comments
Labels: pending close

#8 - Leverage RFC7518 to specify cryptographic algorithms

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 24 comments
Labels: pending close, needs special call, jose, keys

#7 - Leverage existing RFC7517 to specify cryptographic key

Issue - State: closed - Opened by brentzundel over 5 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: pending close

#6 - What happened to the "old" list of did-spec issues?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by mwherman2000 over 5 years ago - 2 comments

#5 - Where will the DID contexts(s) live?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dmitrizagidulin over 5 years ago - 51 comments
Labels: pending close, extensibility

#4 - Figure out three fundamental roles of DIDs (controller, subject, XXX)

Issue - State: closed - Opened by jandrieu over 5 years ago - 41 comments
Labels: pr exists

#3 - Ensure that 'controller' and 'authenticate as' are clear in the spec

Issue - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago
Labels: editorial, pr exists

#2 - Rewrite Authentication section - controller is wrong

Issue - State: closed - Opened by msporny over 5 years ago - 21 comments
Labels: discuss, pr exists

#1 - Fragment identifier semantics are independent of URI scheme

Issue - State: closed - Opened by burnburn over 5 years ago - 29 comments
Labels: pr exists