Ecosyste.ms: Issues
An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.
GitHub / vrenken/EtAlii.Ubigia issues and pull requests
#79 - Improve the TemporalGraphPathWeaver so that it weaves in temporal 'last' relations
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#79 - Improve the TemporalGraphPathWeaver so that it weaves in temporal 'last' relations
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#79 - Improve the TemporalGraphPathWeaver so that it weaves in temporal 'last' relations
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#79 - Improve the TemporalGraphPathWeaver so that it weaves in temporal 'last' relations
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#79 - Improve the TemporalGraphPathWeaver so that it weaves in temporal 'last' relations
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#78 - The EnsureUserIsAuthenticated method should also check the space ID.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#78 - The EnsureUserIsAuthenticated method should also check the space ID.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#78 - The EnsureUserIsAuthenticated method should also check the space ID.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#78 - The EnsureUserIsAuthenticated method should also check the space ID.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#78 - The EnsureUserIsAuthenticated method should also check the space ID.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#78 - The EnsureUserIsAuthenticated method should also check the space ID.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#77 - Can ComponentHelper.GetName be completely replaced by the Generic GetName method?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#77 - Can ComponentHelper.GetName be completely replaced by the Generic GetName method?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#77 - Can ComponentHelper.GetName be completely replaced by the Generic GetName method?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#77 - Can ComponentHelper.GetName be completely replaced by the Generic GetName method?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#77 - Can ComponentHelper.GetName be completely replaced by the Generic GetName method?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#77 - Can ComponentHelper.GetName be completely replaced by the Generic GetName method?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#77 - Can ComponentHelper.GetName be completely replaced by the Generic GetName method?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#77 - Can ComponentHelper.GetName be completely replaced by the Generic GetName method?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#77 - Can ComponentHelper.GetName be completely replaced by the Generic GetName method?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#77 - Can ComponentHelper.GetName be completely replaced by the Generic GetName method?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#77 - Can ComponentHelper.GetName be completely replaced by the Generic GetName method?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#77 - Can ComponentHelper.GetName be completely replaced by the Generic GetName method?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#77 - Can ComponentHelper.GetName be completely replaced by the Generic GetName method?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#76 - Should the EtAlii.Ubigia.BlobPart (or helpers in it) be in the fabric namespace?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#76 - Should the EtAlii.Ubigia.BlobPart (or helpers in it) be in the fabric namespace?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#76 - Should the EtAlii.Ubigia.BlobPart (or helpers in it) be in the fabric namespace?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#76 - Should the EtAlii.Ubigia.BlobPart (or helpers in it) be in the fabric namespace?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#76 - Should the EtAlii.Ubigia.BlobPart (or helpers in it) be in the fabric namespace?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#76 - Should the EtAlii.Ubigia.BlobPart (or helpers in it) be in the fabric namespace?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#76 - Should the EtAlii.Ubigia.BlobPart (or helpers in it) be in the fabric namespace?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#76 - Should the EtAlii.Ubigia.BlobPart (or helpers in it) be in the fabric namespace?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#76 - Should the EtAlii.Ubigia.BlobPart (or helpers in it) be in the fabric namespace?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#76 - Should the EtAlii.Ubigia.BlobPart (or helpers in it) be in the fabric namespace?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#76 - Should the EtAlii.Ubigia.BlobPart (or helpers in it) be in the fabric namespace?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#75 - Is the Node.GetHashCode behavior correct?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#75 - Is the Node.GetHashCode behavior correct?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#75 - Is the Node.GetHashCode behavior correct?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#75 - Is the Node.GetHashCode behavior correct?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#74 - Can these 4 Assign methods in ILogicalNodeSet be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#74 - Can these 4 Assign methods in ILogicalNodeSet be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#74 - Can these 4 Assign methods in ILogicalNodeSet be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#74 - Can these 4 Assign methods in ILogicalNodeSet be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#74 - Can these 4 Assign methods in ILogicalNodeSet be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#74 - Can these 4 Assign methods in ILogicalNodeSet be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#74 - Can these 4 Assign methods in ILogicalNodeSet be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#74 - Can these 4 Assign methods in ILogicalNodeSet be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#74 - Can these 4 Assign methods in ILogicalNodeSet be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#74 - Can these 4 Assign methods in ILogicalNodeSet be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#74 - Can these 4 Assign methods in ILogicalNodeSet be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#74 - Can these 4 Assign methods in ILogicalNodeSet be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#73 - Can the methods in IGraphAssigner be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#73 - Can the methods in IGraphAssigner be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#73 - Can the methods in IGraphAssigner be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#73 - Can the methods in IGraphAssigner be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#73 - Can the methods in IGraphAssigner be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#73 - Can the methods in IGraphAssigner be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#73 - Can the methods in IGraphAssigner be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#73 - Can the methods in IGraphAssigner be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#73 - Can the methods in IGraphAssigner be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#73 - Can the methods in IGraphAssigner be refactored to adhere to the IObserver<object> pattern?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#72 - Why is in the GraphPathFinalRelationTraverser.Traverse only the previousResult used and not the actual result?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#72 - Why is in the GraphPathFinalRelationTraverser.Traverse only the previousResult used and not the actual result?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#72 - Why is in the GraphPathFinalRelationTraverser.Traverse only the previousResult used and not the actual result?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#72 - Why is in the GraphPathFinalRelationTraverser.Traverse only the previousResult used and not the actual result?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#72 - Why is in the GraphPathFinalRelationTraverser.Traverse only the previousResult used and not the actual result?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#72 - Why is in the GraphPathFinalRelationTraverser.Traverse only the previousResult used and not the actual result?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#72 - Why is in the GraphPathFinalRelationTraverser.Traverse only the previousResult used and not the actual result?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#72 - Why is in the GraphPathFinalRelationTraverser.Traverse only the previousResult used and not the actual result?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#71 - Shouldn't the factories as used in the LogicalNodeSet just be their instances? e.g. GraphPathTraverser?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#71 - Shouldn't the factories as used in the LogicalNodeSet just be their instances? e.g. GraphPathTraverser?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#71 - Shouldn't the factories as used in the LogicalNodeSet just be their instances? e.g. GraphPathTraverser?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#71 - Shouldn't the factories as used in the LogicalNodeSet just be their instances? e.g. GraphPathTraverser?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#71 - Shouldn't the factories as used in the LogicalNodeSet just be their instances? e.g. GraphPathTraverser?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#71 - Shouldn't the factories as used in the LogicalNodeSet just be their instances? e.g. GraphPathTraverser?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#71 - Shouldn't the factories as used in the LogicalNodeSet just be their instances? e.g. GraphPathTraverser?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#71 - Shouldn't the factories as used in the LogicalNodeSet just be their instances? e.g. GraphPathTraverser?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#71 - Shouldn't the factories as used in the LogicalNodeSet just be their instances? e.g. GraphPathTraverser?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#71 - Shouldn't the factories as used in the LogicalNodeSet just be their instances? e.g. GraphPathTraverser?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#70 - Is the comparison in the RootHandlerMapperValidator really enough to compare root subject paths?!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#69 - Should the PathSubjectPartContentGetter really return null values if no decent string content can be acquired?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#69 - Should the PathSubjectPartContentGetter really return null values if no decent string content can be acquired?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#69 - Should the PathSubjectPartContentGetter really return null values if no decent string content can be acquired?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#69 - Should the PathSubjectPartContentGetter really return null values if no decent string content can be acquired?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#69 - Should the PathSubjectPartContentGetter really return null values if no decent string content can be acquired?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#69 - Should the PathSubjectPartContentGetter really return null values if no decent string content can be acquired?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question
#69 - Should the PathSubjectPartContentGetter really return null values if no decent string content can be acquired?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: question