Ecosyste.ms: Issues
An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.
GitHub / vrenken/EtAlii.Ubigia issues and pull requests
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#97 - Improve the InfrastructureService: It should not be needed for the logical context to have an address to store and distribute.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#96 - Improve the account templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#95 - Improve the space templating functionality by converting initialization to a script based approach
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#94 - Improve LogicalStorageSet.Start() and use a better way to decide if the local Storage needs to be added.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#94 - Improve LogicalStorageSet.Start() and use a better way to decide if the local Storage needs to be added.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#94 - Improve LogicalStorageSet.Start() and use a better way to decide if the local Storage needs to be added.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#94 - Improve LogicalStorageSet.Start() and use a better way to decide if the local Storage needs to be added.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#93 - Improve the ClientCache to be more intelligent. The current implementation is silly.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#92 - Change the HostTestContextBase to use real testusers, and not admin users.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#92 - Change the HostTestContextBase to use real testusers, and not admin users.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#92 - Change the HostTestContextBase to use real testusers, and not admin users.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
#91 - Improve the ServiceDetailsBuilder: is very ugly and breaks with many standardizations we tried to put in place.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: bug, enhancement
#91 - Improve the ServiceDetailsBuilder: is very ugly and breaks with many standardizations we tried to put in place.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: bug, enhancement
#91 - Improve the ServiceDetailsBuilder: is very ugly and breaks with many standardizations we tried to put in place.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: bug, enhancement
#91 - Improve the ServiceDetailsBuilder: is very ugly and breaks with many standardizations we tried to put in place.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: bug, enhancement
#91 - Improve the ServiceDetailsBuilder: is very ugly and breaks with many standardizations we tried to put in place.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: bug, enhancement
#91 - Improve the ServiceDetailsBuilder: is very ugly and breaks with many standardizations we tried to put in place.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: bug, enhancement
#91 - Improve the ServiceDetailsBuilder: is very ugly and breaks with many standardizations we tried to put in place.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: bug, enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#90 - Refactor the dispose in the Connections to a Disconnect or something similar.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#89 - Improve the LogicalRootSet and make sure that the root information gets backed up and restored.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#89 - Improve the LogicalRootSet and make sure that the root information gets backed up and restored.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#89 - Improve the LogicalRootSet and make sure that the root information gets backed up and restored.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#89 - Improve the LogicalRootSet and make sure that the root information gets backed up and restored.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement
#88 - Doesn't the pattern as applied in DiagnosticsLogicalContextExtension break with the general scaffolding principles?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement, question
#88 - Doesn't the pattern as applied in DiagnosticsLogicalContextExtension break with the general scaffolding principles?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement, question
#88 - Doesn't the pattern as applied in DiagnosticsLogicalContextExtension break with the general scaffolding principles?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement, question
#88 - Doesn't the pattern as applied in DiagnosticsLogicalContextExtension break with the general scaffolding principles?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement, question
#88 - Doesn't the pattern as applied in DiagnosticsLogicalContextExtension break with the general scaffolding principles?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement, question
#88 - Doesn't the pattern as applied in DiagnosticsLogicalContextExtension break with the general scaffolding principles?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement, question
#88 - Doesn't the pattern as applied in DiagnosticsLogicalContextExtension break with the general scaffolding principles?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement, question
#88 - Doesn't the pattern as applied in DiagnosticsLogicalContextExtension break with the general scaffolding principles?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement, question
#87 - Why is the AllChildrenPathSubjectPart case in the TraversalValidator commented out?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement, question
#87 - Why is the AllChildrenPathSubjectPart case in the TraversalValidator commented out?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement, question
#87 - Why is the AllChildrenPathSubjectPart case in the TraversalValidator commented out?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement, question
#87 - Why is the AllChildrenPathSubjectPart case in the TraversalValidator commented out?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vrenken over 3 years ago
Labels: enhancement, question