Ecosyste.ms: Issues

An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.

GitHub / tc39/proposal-rm-builtin-subclassing issues and pull requests

#27 - Use case for overriding RegExp#exec (Type IV)

Issue - State: open - Opened by slevithan 3 months ago - 1 comment

#26 - Add Array.fromAsync to removal plan

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by mgaudet 7 months ago

#25 - Sad to see it go

Issue - State: open - Opened by d3x0r 9 months ago

#24 - Misleading proposal name?

Issue - State: open - Opened by bathos almost 3 years ago - 7 comments

#23 - It will break the web

Issue - State: open - Opened by zloirock over 3 years ago - 29 comments

#22 - Update RegExp subclassing example to use a class

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by ghost almost 4 years ago

#20 - In defense of Type II

Issue - State: open - Opened by getify almost 4 years ago - 9 comments

#19 - Correct Typo in TypedArray description.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by mgaudet almost 4 years ago

#18 - Should Type IV subclassing restrictions also apply to non-RegExp classes?

Issue - State: open - Opened by mgaudet almost 4 years ago - 1 comment

#16 - "Have a good time"

Issue - State: open - Opened by mgaudet almost 4 years ago - 1 comment

#15 - Add stage and last presentation to explainer

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by codehag over 4 years ago

#14 - Moving this to TC39

Issue - State: closed - Opened by codehag over 4 years ago - 1 comment

#13 - Deprecate `Symbol.species`

Issue - State: open - Opened by ilias-t over 4 years ago - 5 comments

#12 - change the title

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by codehag over 4 years ago

#11 - Update examples

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by syg over 4 years ago

#10 - Clarify or fix derived class constructors in the examples

Issue - State: closed - Opened by jandem over 4 years ago - 8 comments

#9 - Why not delegate to `this.constructor`

Issue - State: open - Opened by syg over 4 years ago - 1 comment

#8 - Clarify that the RegExp-like protocol is not proposed to be removed

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by syg over 4 years ago - 3 comments

#7 - add examples

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by codehag over 4 years ago

#6 - What is the difference between Type 2 and Type 3?

Issue - State: open - Opened by jridgewell over 4 years ago - 4 comments

#5 - Additional complexity you could remove from Promises

Issue - State: open - Opened by domenic over 4 years ago - 17 comments

#4 - Leave IsRegExp out of this?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by littledan over 4 years ago - 3 comments

#3 - Ambiguity about what this does for static methods in subclasses

Issue - State: closed - Opened by littledan over 4 years ago - 1 comment

#2 - Editorial suggestion: Explain what stays the same in the README

Issue - State: closed - Opened by littledan over 4 years ago - 5 comments

#1 - Semantics suggestion: Use SpeciesConstructor just for new.target

Issue - State: open - Opened by littledan over 4 years ago - 9 comments