GitHub / tc39/proposal-operator-overloading issues and pull requests
#66 - Just another suggestion (with Symbol)
Issue -
State: open - Opened by MAZ01001 5 months ago
- 3 comments
#65 - Idea: just a more simply solution
Issue -
State: open - Opened by stfbd12138 7 months ago
- 20 comments
#64 - fix typo
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by iahu 8 months ago
#63 - Please do this!!
Issue -
State: open - Opened by matthew-dean over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#62 - Fix grammar
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by aikeru about 2 years ago
#61 - Fix a small typo in the README
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Pandapip1 over 2 years ago
#60 - Typo
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Rudxain about 3 years ago
- 3 comments
#59 - Trouble using the plugin
Issue -
State: open - Opened by XiaofanLinUS about 3 years ago
#58 - [SUGGESTION] Enable discussions tab
Issue -
State: open - Opened by FrameMuse about 3 years ago
#57 - [IDEA] Define operators only in classes
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by FrameMuse about 3 years ago
- 5 comments
#56 - Suggesion: Define Operators with functions
Issue -
State: open - Opened by Haringat about 3 years ago
- 11 comments
#55 - Problems with with
Issue -
State: open - Opened by Haringat about 3 years ago
- 12 comments
#54 - [IDEA] operator overloading via Proxy traps
Issue -
State: open - Opened by Haringat about 3 years ago
#53 - Implicitly overloaded operators and sanity restrictions
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jhmaster2000 over 3 years ago
- 2 comments
#52 - Suggestion: operator() and operator new
Issue -
State: open - Opened by yw662 over 3 years ago
- 17 comments
#51 - Use local order instead of global OperatorCounter
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bergus over 3 years ago
#50 - QuickJS implementation
Issue -
State: open - Opened by dy almost 4 years ago
#49 - Object with overloads vs ordinary Object
Issue -
State: open - Opened by lightmare almost 4 years ago
- 1 comment
#48 - Wildcard suggestion - new `====` and `>===` operators
Issue -
State: open - Opened by suspiciousfellow almost 4 years ago
- 3 comments
#47 - The second bullet of "How does this proposal compare to operator overloading in other languages?" in the Q&A is unclear.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by dead-claudia about 4 years ago
#46 - Implementation Example (pro-implementation case)
Issue -
State: open - Opened by 0X-JonMichaelGalindo about 4 years ago
#45 - Is the proposal still considered ?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by TheEpicFace007 about 4 years ago
- 8 comments
#44 - Use a mathematical definition of operators, decoupled from class definitions
Issue -
State: open - Opened by PaulKiddle about 4 years ago
- 3 comments
#43 - API doesn't work with class private member proposal
Issue -
State: open - Opened by ghost over 4 years ago
- 3 comments
#42 - Importing specific operators
Issue -
State: open - Opened by ghost over 4 years ago
- 2 comments
#41 - Operator overloading breaks Asm.js
Issue -
State: open - Opened by ghost over 4 years ago
- 4 comments
#40 - The syntax should be scoped to a block instead of a module
Issue -
State: open - Opened by Jack-Works over 4 years ago
- 6 comments
#39 - fixed really small babel transpile issue
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by HarryVTripathi over 4 years ago
- 2 comments
#38 - BABEL_TRANSFORM_ERROR: Error while transpiling with Babel
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by HarryVTripathi over 4 years ago
#37 - suggestion - forbid overloading division-operator `/` to guard against divsion-by-nan/zero footguns
Issue -
State: open - Opened by kaizhu256 almost 5 years ago
- 2 comments
#36 - Predictability goals are confusing
Issue -
State: open - Opened by Zekfad almost 5 years ago
- 3 comments
#35 - It's already possible to overload the arithmetic operators +-*/
Issue -
State: open - Opened by pyrocto almost 5 years ago
- 2 comments
#34 - spec: fixed small error
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by 0xflotus almost 5 years ago
#33 - Deprecating and remove implicit type coerision with adding operator overloading
Issue -
State: open - Opened by redradist almost 5 years ago
- 3 comments
#32 - Have you looked how it works in other languages ?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by jonatjano about 5 years ago
#31 - Fix possible implementation of Big
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by vilic about 5 years ago
- 1 comment
#30 - import overloads into the current module (scope overload to a module) with import attributes?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by trusktr about 5 years ago
- 7 comments
#29 - Operator overloading class syntax using TS-like method overloading and "extension" classes
Issue -
State: open - Opened by sirisian about 5 years ago
- 6 comments
#28 - Explain integrity/predictability goals better in the explainer
Issue -
State: open - Opened by littledan about 5 years ago
- 1 comment
#27 - doc: change stage 0 to 1
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by pemrouz over 5 years ago
- 1 comment
#26 - [IDEA] Symbols
Issue -
State: open - Opened by jcubic over 5 years ago
- 9 comments
#25 - [IDEA] what is we remove commutativity ?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by lifaon74 over 5 years ago
- 22 comments
#24 - <=> starship operator for unified overloading of comparison operators
Issue -
State: open - Opened by c69 over 5 years ago
- 4 comments
#23 - Consider use with `Object.is` and `Array.isArray` (or a tap listener)
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by achung89 over 5 years ago
- 6 comments
#22 - Fixing errors reported by Fabrice Bellard
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan over 5 years ago
#21 - Consider some Object.defineOperator and Symbols
Issue -
State: open - Opened by lifaon74 over 5 years ago
- 4 comments
#20 - Operator overloading work plan
Issue -
State: open - Opened by littledan over 5 years ago
#19 - Transfer this to tc39
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by littledan over 5 years ago
- 1 comment
#18 - Discussion: Operator overloading as alternative to extensible numeric literals
Issue -
State: open - Opened by rbuckton over 5 years ago
- 5 comments
#17 - Consider the confusion around `==` vs `===`
Issue -
State: open - Opened by styfle over 5 years ago
- 4 comments
#16 - Consider operators for controlling "truthiness" of a value.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by rbuckton over 5 years ago
- 10 comments
#15 - Consider syntactic declaration of operators
Issue -
State: open - Opened by rbuckton over 5 years ago
- 18 comments
#14 - Will `with operators from X` prevent polymorphism?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by miyaokamarina over 5 years ago
- 21 comments
#13 - Fix a typo in the possible implementation of numeric types example
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by chicoxyzzy over 5 years ago
#12 - Update README.md
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan over 5 years ago
#11 - Minimal version of this - Numeric Types Only
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by c69 over 6 years ago
- 5 comments
#10 - add AssemblyScript link
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by MaxGraey over 6 years ago
- 5 comments
#9 - What about mention AssemblyScript in "Cross-language comparison"?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by MaxGraey over 6 years ago
- 1 comment
#8 - Overloading operators ++ and --
Issue -
State: open - Opened by jakobkummerow over 6 years ago
- 3 comments
#7 - fix typo
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by mikesamuel over 6 years ago
#6 - Adding temperature quantities can cause surprising results.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by mikesamuel over 6 years ago
- 6 comments
Labels: documentation
#5 - This seems a little too decorator-y
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by dead-claudia over 6 years ago
- 13 comments
#4 - String `+` right operand optimization
Issue -
State: open - Opened by mikesamuel over 6 years ago
- 3 comments
#3 - Why is the explicit with declaration required?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by peey over 6 years ago
- 6 comments
#1 - Create LICENSE
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan over 6 years ago