Ecosyste.ms: Issues
An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.
GitHub / tc39/proposal-class-fields issues and pull requests
#100 - A summary of feedback regarding the # sigil prefix
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by glen-84 over 6 years ago
- 391 comments
#100 - A summary of feedback regarding the # sigil prefix
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by glen-84 over 6 years ago
- 391 comments
#99 - The '#' looks awful, please change it
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by gynet over 6 years ago
- 3 comments
#99 - The '#' looks awful, please change it
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by gynet over 6 years ago
- 3 comments
#98 - Normative: Thread through lexically scoped private names
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan over 6 years ago
#98 - Normative: Thread through lexically scoped private names
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan over 6 years ago
#97 - Editorial: Fix up creating the internal slots for private names
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan over 6 years ago
#97 - Editorial: Fix up creating the internal slots for private names
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan over 6 years ago
#96 - Clarify that private fields can be accessed from within eval
Issue -
State: open - Opened by littledan over 6 years ago
- 6 comments
Labels: editorial
#96 - Clarify that private fields can be accessed from within eval
Issue -
State: open - Opened by littledan over 6 years ago
- 6 comments
Labels: editorial
#95 - Breaking encapsulation?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jwalton over 6 years ago
- 3 comments
#95 - Breaking encapsulation?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by jwalton over 6 years ago
- 3 comments
#94 - Alternate strawman idea
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by dead-claudia over 6 years ago
- 8 comments
#94 - Alternate strawman idea
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by dead-claudia over 6 years ago
- 8 comments
#93 - use-case for private-fields? as a developer working on a web-project, can you give examples where private-fields would be useful?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by kaizhu256 over 6 years ago
- 9 comments
#93 - use-case for private-fields? as a developer working on a web-project, can you give examples where private-fields would be useful?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by kaizhu256 over 6 years ago
- 9 comments
#92 - Normative: End `this` TDZ before running initializers
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan over 6 years ago
- 6 comments
#92 - Normative: End `this` TDZ before running initializers
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan over 6 years ago
- 6 comments
#91 - FAQ tweaks
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bakkot over 6 years ago
- 1 comment
#91 - FAQ tweaks
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bakkot over 6 years ago
- 1 comment
#90 - private and protected are like static and super
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by d8corp over 6 years ago
- 26 comments
#90 - private and protected are like static and super
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by d8corp over 6 years ago
- 26 comments
#89 - Сlass field location
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by d8corp over 6 years ago
- 17 comments
#89 - Сlass field location
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by d8corp over 6 years ago
- 17 comments
#88 - Allow let bindings in class declaration
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by oskardahlberg over 6 years ago
- 3 comments
#88 - Allow let bindings in class declaration
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by oskardahlberg over 6 years ago
- 3 comments
#87 - Consistency across all uses of properties, just like with regular properties.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by trusktr over 6 years ago
- 5 comments
#87 - Consistency across all uses of properties, just like with regular properties.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by trusktr over 6 years ago
- 5 comments
#86 - What about protected fields?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by trusktr over 6 years ago
- 5 comments
#86 - What about protected fields?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by trusktr over 6 years ago
- 5 comments
#85 - Problematic that classes are still unnamed in static initializers?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by anba over 6 years ago
- 24 comments
Labels: semantics
#85 - Problematic that classes are still unnamed in static initializers?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by anba over 6 years ago
- 24 comments
Labels: semantics
#84 - Is it too late to exchange @ / # usage?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by hax over 6 years ago
- 34 comments
#84 - Is it too late to exchange @ / # usage?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by hax over 6 years ago
- 34 comments
#83 - Allow to mark class fields as readonly
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by bschaepper over 6 years ago
- 48 comments
#83 - Allow to mark class fields as readonly
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by bschaepper over 6 years ago
- 48 comments
#82 - Discussion/Proposal using alternative new syntax with "Symbol.for(this)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by eddyw over 6 years ago
- 9 comments
#82 - Discussion/Proposal using alternative new syntax with "Symbol.for(this)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by eddyw over 6 years ago
- 9 comments
#81 - Consider re-separating Class proposals
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by justsml over 6 years ago
- 21 comments
#81 - Consider re-separating Class proposals
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by justsml over 6 years ago
- 21 comments
#80 - Why not use arrow functions to bind member functions in proposal example?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by arthur-tacca over 6 years ago
- 29 comments
#80 - Why not use arrow functions to bind member functions in proposal example?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by arthur-tacca over 6 years ago
- 29 comments
#79 - Preserve all current syntax, but add support for dynamicity
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by EthanRutherford over 6 years ago
- 10 comments
#79 - Preserve all current syntax, but add support for dynamicity
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by EthanRutherford over 6 years ago
- 10 comments
#78 - Reword note implying shorthand syntax
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bakkot over 6 years ago
#78 - Reword note implying shorthand syntax
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bakkot over 6 years ago
#77 - Please do not use "#"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by babakness over 6 years ago
- 97 comments
#77 - Please do not use "#"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by babakness over 6 years ago
- 97 comments
#76 - Class-Block scope declaration
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by shannon over 6 years ago
- 4 comments
#76 - Class-Block scope declaration
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by shannon over 6 years ago
- 4 comments
#75 - Make # an object on the instance
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by shannon over 6 years ago
- 77 comments
#75 - Make # an object on the instance
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by shannon over 6 years ago
- 77 comments
#74 - Array syntax for private properties
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by shdwjk over 6 years ago
- 12 comments
#74 - Array syntax for private properties
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by shdwjk over 6 years ago
- 12 comments
#73 - Remove the private fields idea ("#"), at least for now
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by TheNavigateur over 6 years ago
- 16 comments
#72 - Preventing name collisions between public and private properties
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by mbrowne over 6 years ago
- 12 comments
#72 - Preventing name collisions between public and private properties
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by mbrowne over 6 years ago
- 12 comments
#71 - Question regarding nested classes
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by billinghamj over 6 years ago
- 1 comment
#71 - Question regarding nested classes
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by billinghamj over 6 years ago
- 1 comment
#70 - Class field definitions are not limited to Identifiers
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by gibson042 over 6 years ago
- 2 comments
#69 - Proposal to avoid the sigil
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by dead-claudia over 6 years ago
- 9 comments
#69 - Proposal to avoid the sigil
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by dead-claudia over 6 years ago
- 9 comments
#68 - Fix ASI error in readme
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bakkot over 6 years ago
#68 - Fix ASI error in readme
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bakkot over 6 years ago
#67 - Editorial: Describe ASI hazards
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan almost 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#67 - Editorial: Describe ASI hazards
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan almost 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#66 - Document initialization order and other semantic details at a high level
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by littledan almost 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#66 - Document initialization order and other semantic details at a high level
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by littledan almost 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#65 - Normative: Remove static fields
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan almost 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#64 - Add private field syntax readme
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bakkot almost 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#64 - Add private field syntax readme
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bakkot almost 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#63 - Proposal: `#` shorthand for private _and_ public fields
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rattrayalex almost 7 years ago
- 15 comments
#63 - Proposal: `#` shorthand for private _and_ public fields
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rattrayalex almost 7 years ago
- 15 comments
#62 - Context of "this" in properties definition
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by syabro almost 7 years ago
- 11 comments
#62 - Context of "this" in properties definition
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by syabro almost 7 years ago
- 11 comments
#61 - Use both the # sigil and keywords
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by lpd-au almost 7 years ago
- 17 comments
#61 - Use both the # sigil and keywords
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by lpd-au almost 7 years ago
- 17 comments
#60 - Should private fields be per class execution, or based on source position?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by littledan almost 7 years ago
- 40 comments
#60 - Should private fields be per class execution, or based on source position?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by littledan almost 7 years ago
- 40 comments
#59 - What about protected methods, better declaration of private fields, private async functions, and destructuring?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by eddyw almost 7 years ago
- 35 comments
#59 - What about protected methods, better declaration of private fields, private async functions, and destructuring?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by eddyw almost 7 years ago
- 35 comments
#58 - this.onclick = this.clicked.bind(this);
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by dmitriid almost 7 years ago
- 17 comments
#58 - this.onclick = this.clicked.bind(this);
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by dmitriid almost 7 years ago
- 17 comments
#57 - Tooling implementation status
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vjpr almost 7 years ago
- 12 comments
#57 - Tooling implementation status
Issue -
State: open - Opened by vjpr almost 7 years ago
- 12 comments
#56 - Proposal: keyword to replace `#` sigil
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rattrayalex almost 7 years ago
- 82 comments
#56 - Proposal: keyword to replace `#` sigil
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rattrayalex almost 7 years ago
- 82 comments
#55 - DefineFields: how to tests observable abrupt completion for field with IsAnonymouseFunctionDefinition=true
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by spectranaut almost 7 years ago
- 2 comments
#55 - DefineFields: how to tests observable abrupt completion for field with IsAnonymouseFunctionDefinition=true
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by spectranaut almost 7 years ago
- 2 comments
#54 - Normative: Ban static private field declarations
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan almost 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#54 - Normative: Ban static private field declarations
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by littledan almost 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#53 - Typo in ClassElementEvaluation
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by spectranaut almost 7 years ago
#53 - Typo in ClassElementEvaluation
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by spectranaut almost 7 years ago
#52 - Expected behaviour question
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by andyjansson almost 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#52 - Expected behaviour question
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by andyjansson almost 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#51 - Adoption timeframe for major browsers?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by kirkouimet almost 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#51 - Adoption timeframe for major browsers?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by kirkouimet almost 7 years ago
- 1 comment
#50 - Typo in DefineFields
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by spectranaut almost 7 years ago
#50 - Typo in DefineFields
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by spectranaut almost 7 years ago
#49 - NonConstructorElementDefinitions should not exclude class fields
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by littledan almost 7 years ago