seedstack/business issues and pull requests

#43 - Remove the checks for annotation using fromFactory

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#43 - Remove the checks for annotation using fromFactory

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#43 - Remove the checks for annotation using fromFactory

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#43 - Remove the checks for annotation using fromFactory

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#43 - Remove the checks for annotation using fromFactory

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#42 - Fix using identity handler with default factory.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#42 - Fix using identity handler with default factory.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#42 - Fix using identity handler with default factory.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#42 - Fix using identity handler with default factory.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#42 - Fix using identity handler with default factory.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#42 - Fix using identity handler with default factory.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#41 - Fix default assembler bindings

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#41 - Fix default assembler bindings

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#41 - Fix default assembler bindings

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#41 - Fix default assembler bindings

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#41 - Fix default assembler bindings

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#41 - Fix default assembler bindings

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#40 - Default assemblers don't work when there is multiple DTO for the same aggregate.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#40 - Default assemblers don't work when there is multiple DTO for the same aggregate.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#40 - Default assemblers don't work when there is multiple DTO for the same aggregate.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#40 - Default assemblers don't work when there is multiple DTO for the same aggregate.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#40 - Default assemblers don't work when there is multiple DTO for the same aggregate.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#40 - Default assemblers don't work when there is multiple DTO for the same aggregate.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#40 - Default assemblers don't work when there is multiple DTO for the same aggregate.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#40 - Default assemblers don't work when there is multiple DTO for the same aggregate.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#39 - Singleton annotation is not considered in bindings

Issue - State: closed - Opened by adrienlauer about 9 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: invalid

#39 - Singleton annotation is not considered in bindings

Issue - State: closed - Opened by adrienlauer about 9 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: invalid

#39 - Singleton annotation is not considered in bindings

Issue - State: closed - Opened by adrienlauer about 9 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: invalid

#39 - Singleton annotation is not considered in bindings

Issue - State: closed - Opened by adrienlauer about 9 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: invalid

#39 - Singleton annotation is not considered in bindings

Issue - State: closed - Opened by adrienlauer about 9 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: invalid

#39 - Singleton annotation is not considered in bindings

Issue - State: closed - Opened by adrienlauer about 9 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: invalid

#39 - Singleton annotation is not considered in bindings

Issue - State: closed - Opened by adrienlauer about 9 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: invalid

#38 - FluentAssembler cannot invoke factory methods without parameter

Issue - State: closed - Opened by adrienlauer about 9 years ago
Labels: bug

#38 - FluentAssembler cannot invoke factory methods without parameter

Issue - State: closed - Opened by adrienlauer about 9 years ago
Labels: bug

#38 - FluentAssembler cannot invoke factory methods without parameter

Issue - State: closed - Opened by adrienlauer about 9 years ago
Labels: bug

#38 - FluentAssembler cannot invoke factory methods without parameter

Issue - State: closed - Opened by adrienlauer about 9 years ago
Labels: bug

#38 - FluentAssembler cannot invoke factory methods without parameter

Issue - State: closed - Opened by adrienlauer about 9 years ago
Labels: bug

#37 - Data import: Bind default data importer

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: new feature

#37 - Data import: Bind default data importer

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: new feature

#37 - Data import: Bind default data importer

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: new feature

#37 - Data import: Bind default data importer

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: new feature

#37 - Data import: Bind default data importer

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: new feature

#37 - Data import: Bind default data importer

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: new feature

#37 - Data import: Bind default data importer

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: new feature

#37 - Data import: Bind default data importer

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: new feature

#36 - Fix the detection of Value Object used by the DSL

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 2 comments

#36 - Fix the detection of Value Object used by the DSL

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 2 comments

#36 - Fix the detection of Value Object used by the DSL

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 2 comments

#36 - Fix the detection of Value Object used by the DSL

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 2 comments

#35 - Remove the fallback to ModelMapper in the DSL

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#35 - Remove the fallback to ModelMapper in the DSL

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#35 - Remove the fallback to ModelMapper in the DSL

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#35 - Remove the fallback to ModelMapper in the DSL

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#35 - Remove the fallback to ModelMapper in the DSL

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#35 - Remove the fallback to ModelMapper in the DSL

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#35 - Remove the fallback to ModelMapper in the DSL

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#34 - Assembler consistency#31

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#34 - Assembler consistency#31

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#34 - Assembler consistency#31

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#34 - Assembler consistency#31

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#34 - Assembler consistency#31

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#34 - Assembler consistency#31

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#34 - Assembler consistency#31

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#34 - Assembler consistency#31

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#33 - Qualifiers improvements

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#33 - Qualifiers improvements

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#33 - Qualifiers improvements

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#33 - Qualifiers improvements

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#33 - Qualifiers improvements

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#33 - Qualifiers improvements

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#33 - Qualifiers improvements

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#33 - Qualifiers improvements

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#32 - Qualifiers improvements -- aborted

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#32 - Qualifiers improvements -- aborted

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#32 - Qualifiers improvements -- aborted

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#32 - Qualifiers improvements -- aborted

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago

#31 - Improve consistency between the Assembler DSL and the Assembler interface

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#31 - Improve consistency between the Assembler DSL and the Assembler interface

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#31 - Improve consistency between the Assembler DSL and the Assembler interface

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#31 - Improve consistency between the Assembler DSL and the Assembler interface

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#31 - Improve consistency between the Assembler DSL and the Assembler interface

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#31 - Improve consistency between the Assembler DSL and the Assembler interface

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#31 - Improve consistency between the Assembler DSL and the Assembler interface

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#30 - Default assemblers are not bound if a user assembler is already bind

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago
Labels: refactoring

#30 - Default assemblers are not bound if a user assembler is already bind

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago
Labels: refactoring

#30 - Default assemblers are not bound if a user assembler is already bind

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago
Labels: refactoring

#30 - Default assemblers are not bound if a user assembler is already bind

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago
Labels: refactoring

#29 - Default assembler refactor

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 2 comments

#29 - Default assembler refactor

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 2 comments

#29 - Default assembler refactor

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 2 comments

#29 - Default assembler refactor

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 2 comments

#29 - Default assembler refactor

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 2 comments

#29 - Default assembler refactor

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 2 comments

#27 - Move the InMemoryRepository in business test

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#27 - Move the InMemoryRepository in business test

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#27 - Move the InMemoryRepository in business test

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#27 - Move the InMemoryRepository in business test

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#27 - Move the InMemoryRepository in business test

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#27 - Move the InMemoryRepository in business test

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#27 - Move the InMemoryRepository in business test

Issue - State: closed - Opened by pith about 9 years ago - 1 comment

GitHub / seedstack/business issues and pull requests