scallop/scallop issues and pull requests

#182 - validate operators for Path

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by rvanheest over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#182 - validate operators for Path

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by rvanheest over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#182 - validate operators for Path

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by rvanheest over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#182 - validate operators for Path

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by rvanheest over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#182 - validate operators for Path

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by rvanheest over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#182 - validate operators for Path

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by rvanheest over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#182 - validate operators for Path

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by rvanheest over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#181 - [Suggestion] To be able to disable a command line

Issue - State: open - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: enhancement

#181 - [Suggestion] To be able to disable a command line

Issue - State: open - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: enhancement

#181 - [Suggestion] To be able to disable a command line

Issue - State: open - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: enhancement

#181 - [Suggestion] To be able to disable a command line

Issue - State: open - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: enhancement

#181 - [Suggestion] To be able to disable a command line

Issue - State: open - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: enhancement

#180 - How to parse Map[String,String] ?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 6 comments

#180 - How to parse Map[String,String] ?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 6 comments

#180 - How to parse Map[String,String] ?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 6 comments

#180 - How to parse Map[String,String] ?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 6 comments

#180 - How to parse Map[String,String] ?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 6 comments

#180 - How to parse Map[String,String] ?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 6 comments

#180 - How to parse Map[String,String] ?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 6 comments

#179 - Subcommands

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 3 comments

#179 - Subcommands

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 3 comments

#179 - Subcommands

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 3 comments

#179 - Subcommands

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 3 comments

#179 - Subcommands

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 3 comments

#179 - Subcommands

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 3 comments

#179 - Subcommands

Issue - State: closed - Opened by leobenkel over 5 years ago - 3 comments

#178 - ScallopOption.isSupplied throws an exception if the option is transformed and no name is explicitly given

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 4 comments

#178 - ScallopOption.isSupplied throws an exception if the option is transformed and no name is explicitly given

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 4 comments

#178 - ScallopOption.isSupplied throws an exception if the option is transformed and no name is explicitly given

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 4 comments

#178 - ScallopOption.isSupplied throws an exception if the option is transformed and no name is explicitly given

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 4 comments

#178 - ScallopOption.isSupplied throws an exception if the option is transformed and no name is explicitly given

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 4 comments

#178 - ScallopOption.isSupplied throws an exception if the option is transformed and no name is explicitly given

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 4 comments

#178 - ScallopOption.isSupplied throws an exception if the option is transformed and no name is explicitly given

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 4 comments

#178 - ScallopOption.isSupplied throws an exception if the option is transformed and no name is explicitly given

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 4 comments

#178 - ScallopOption.isSupplied throws an exception if the option is transformed and no name is explicitly given

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 4 comments

#178 - ScallopOption.isSupplied throws an exception if the option is transformed and no name is explicitly given

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 4 comments

#178 - ScallopOption.isSupplied throws an exception if the option is transformed and no name is explicitly given

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 4 comments

#178 - ScallopOption.isSupplied throws an exception if the option is transformed and no name is explicitly given

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 4 comments

#178 - ScallopOption.isSupplied throws an exception if the option is transformed and no name is explicitly given

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 4 comments

#177 - Implicit short names not considered when deciding if version/help have short names

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 5 comments

#177 - Implicit short names not considered when deciding if version/help have short names

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 5 comments

#177 - Implicit short names not considered when deciding if version/help have short names

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 5 comments

#177 - Implicit short names not considered when deciding if version/help have short names

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 5 comments

#177 - Implicit short names not considered when deciding if version/help have short names

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 5 comments

#177 - Implicit short names not considered when deciding if version/help have short names

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 5 comments

#177 - Implicit short names not considered when deciding if version/help have short names

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 5 comments

#177 - Implicit short names not considered when deciding if version/help have short names

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 5 comments

#177 - Implicit short names not considered when deciding if version/help have short names

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 5 comments

#177 - Implicit short names not considered when deciding if version/help have short names

Issue - State: closed - Opened by LennartH almost 6 years ago - 5 comments