Ecosyste.ms: Issues
An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.
GitHub / rainlanguage/rain.flow issues and pull requests
#100 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC1155 (single element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#100 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC1155 (single element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#99 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC20 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#99 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC20 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#98 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC721 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#98 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC721 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#97 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC1155 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#97 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC1155 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#96 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/multicall" — test case "should call multiple flows from same flow contract at once using multicall"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#96 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/multicall" — test case "should call multiple flows from same flow contract at once using multicall"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#95 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flowTime" — test case "should support gating flows where a flow time has already been registered for the given id"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#94 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should utilize context in HANDLE_TRANSFER entrypoint"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#94 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should utilize context in HANDLE_TRANSFER entrypoint"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#93 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should not be able to access values set in a flow across different flows"
Issue -
State: open - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#93 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should not be able to access values set in a flow across different flows"
Issue -
State: open - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#92 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should fail when token burner is not the owner"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#92 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should fail when token burner is not the owner"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#91 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should flow for ERC20<->ERC20 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#91 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should flow for ERC20<->ERC20 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#90 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should flow for ERC721<->ERC721 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#90 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should flow for ERC721<->ERC721 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#89 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should flow for ERC1155<->ERC1155 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#89 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should flow for ERC1155<->ERC1155 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#88 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should flow for erc20<->erc721 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#88 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should flow for erc20<->erc721 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#87 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should flow for erc721<->erc1155 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#87 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should flow for erc721<->erc1155 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#86 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should mint and burn tokens per flow in exchange for another token (e.g. ERC20)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#86 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should mint and burn tokens per flow in exchange for another token (e.g. ERC20)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#85 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should support transferPreflight hook"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#85 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should support transferPreflight hook"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#84 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should not flow if number of sentinels is less than MIN_FLOW_SENTINELS"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#84 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/flow" — test case "should not flow if number of sentinels is less than MIN_FLOW_SENTINELS"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#83 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/expressions" — test case "should validate context emitted in context event"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#83 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/expressions" — test case "should validate context emitted in context event"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#82 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/construction" — test case "should fail if flowERC721 is deployed with bad callerMeta"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#82 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/construction" — test case "should fail if flowERC721 is deployed with bad callerMeta"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#81 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/construction" — test case "should initialize on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#81 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC721/construction" — test case "should initialize on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#80 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/signedContext" — test case "should validate a signed context"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#80 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/signedContext" — test case "should validate a signed context"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#79 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/signedContext" — test case "should validate multiple signed contexts"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#79 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/signedContext" — test case "should validate multiple signed contexts"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#78 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview empty flow io"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#78 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview empty flow io"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#77 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should not flow if it does not meet 'ensure' requirement"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#77 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should not flow if it does not meet 'ensure' requirement"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#76 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC20 (single element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#76 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC20 (single element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#75 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC721 (single element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#75 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC721 (single element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#74 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC1155 (single element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#74 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC1155 (single element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#73 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC20 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#73 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC20 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#72 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC721 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#72 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC721 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#71 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC1155 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#71 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC1155 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#70 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/multicall" — test case "should call multiple flows from same flow contract at once using multicall"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#69 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/flowTime" — test case "should support gating flows where a flow time has already been registered for the given id"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#68 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/flow" — test case "should utilize context in CAN_TRANSFER entrypoint"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#67 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/flow" — test case "should not be able to access values set in a flow across different flows"
Issue -
State: open - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#66 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/flow" — test case "should flow for ERC20<->ERC20 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#65 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/flow" — test case "should flow for ERC721<->ERC721 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#64 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/flow" — test case "should flow for ERC1155<->ERC1155 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#63 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/flow" — test case "should flow for erc20<->erc721 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#62 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/flow" — test case "should flow for erc721<->erc1155 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#61 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/flow" — test case "should mint and burn tokens per flow in exchange for another token (e.g. ERC20)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#60 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/flow" — test case "should not flow if number of sentinels is less than MIN_FLOW_SENTINELS"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#59 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/expressions" — test case "should validate context emitted in context event"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#58 - Porting legacy tests from ".FlowERC20/construction" — test case "should initialize on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#57 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/flowTime" — test case "should support gating flows where a flow time has already been registered for the given id"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#56 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/signedContext" — test case "should validate a signed context"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#55 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/signedContext" — test case "should validate multiple signed contexts"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#54 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/previewFlow" — test case "should preview empty flow IO"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#53 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/previewFlow" — test case "should not flow if it does not meet 'ensure' requirement"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
- 1 comment
#52 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC20 (single element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#51 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC721 (single element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#50 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC1155 (single element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#49 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC20 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#48 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC721 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#47 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/previewFlow" — test case "should preview defined flow IO for ERC1155 (multi element arrays)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#46 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/multicall" — test case "should call multiple flows from same flow contract at once using multicall"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#45 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/deployExpression" — test case "should validate context from the context event"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#44 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/deployExpression" — test case "should deploy expression"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#43 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/context" — test case "should register and load flow times into context (canFlow if no registered flow)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
- 2 comments
#42 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/context" — test case "should register and load flow times into context (throttle flow output amount)"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
- 2 comments
#41 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/flow" — test case "should not be able to access values set in a flow across different flows"
Issue -
State: open - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
- 2 comments
#40 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/flow" — test case "should error if ERC20 flow (from) is other than the source contract or msg.sender"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#39 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/flow" — test case "should flow for ERC20<->ERC20 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#38 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/flow" — test case "should flow for ERC721<->ERC721 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#37 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/flow" — test case "should flow for ERC1155<->ERC1155 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#36 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/flow" — test case "should flow for erc721<->erc1155 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#35 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/flow" — test case "should flow for erc20<->erc721 on the good path"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#34 - Please confirm the relevance of Flow/flowTime. https://github.com/rainlanguage/rain-protocol/blob/develop/test/Flow/Flow/flowTime.ts
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#33 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/flow" — test case "should error if ERC1155 flow (from) is other than the source contract or msg.sender"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#32 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/flow" — test case "should error if ERC721 flow (from) is other than the source contract or msg.sender"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
#31 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/flow" — test case "should not flow if number of sentinels is less than MIN_FLOW_SENTINELS" Check relevance.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago
- 2 comments
#30 - Porting legacy tests from ".Flow/flow" — test case "should error if the flow being evaluated is unregistered"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Erikd-dev 6 months ago