Ecosyste.ms: Issues
An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.
GitHub / osgi/osgi issues and pull requests
#535 - Enable Github discussions?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#535 - Enable Github discussions?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#535 - Enable Github discussions?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#535 - Enable Github discussions?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#535 - Enable Github discussions?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#534 - [jdbc] requirement of properties is inappropriately mentioned in the "125.3.2 Using Database Drivers" section
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#534 - [jdbc] requirement of properties is inappropriately mentioned in the "125.3.2 Using Database Drivers" section
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#534 - [jdbc] requirement of properties is inappropriately mentioned in the "125.3.2 Using Database Drivers" section
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#534 - [jdbc] requirement of properties is inappropriately mentioned in the "125.3.2 Using Database Drivers" section
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#534 - [jdbc] requirement of properties is inappropriately mentioned in the "125.3.2 Using Database Drivers" section
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#534 - [jdbc] requirement of properties is inappropriately mentioned in the "125.3.2 Using Database Drivers" section
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#534 - [jdbc] requirement of properties is inappropriately mentioned in the "125.3.2 Using Database Drivers" section
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#534 - [jdbc] requirement of properties is inappropriately mentioned in the "125.3.2 Using Database Drivers" section
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#533 - [tck][jdbc] 125.2.1 Life Cycle is not covered by the TCK
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#533 - [tck][jdbc] 125.2.1 Life Cycle is not covered by the TCK
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#533 - [tck][jdbc] 125.2.1 Life Cycle is not covered by the TCK
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#533 - [tck][jdbc] 125.2.1 Life Cycle is not covered by the TCK
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#533 - [tck][jdbc] 125.2.1 Life Cycle is not covered by the TCK
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#533 - [tck][jdbc] 125.2.1 Life Cycle is not covered by the TCK
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#533 - [tck][jdbc] 125.2.1 Life Cycle is not covered by the TCK
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#533 - [tck][jdbc] 125.2.1 Life Cycle is not covered by the TCK
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#533 - [tck][jdbc] 125.2.1 Life Cycle is not covered by the TCK
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#532 - JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#532 - JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#532 - JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#532 - JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#532 - JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#532 - JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#532 - JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#532 - JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#532 - JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#531 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) should be parameterized
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#531 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) should be parameterized
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#531 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) should be parameterized
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#531 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) should be parameterized
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#531 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) should be parameterized
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#531 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) should be parameterized
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#530 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) is not parameterized
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#530 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) is not parameterized
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#530 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) is not parameterized
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#530 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) is not parameterized
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#530 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) is not parameterized
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#530 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) is not parameterized
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#530 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) is not parameterized
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#530 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) is not parameterized
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#530 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) is not parameterized
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#530 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) is not parameterized
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#530 - JDBCTestCase.testMinimumOneDataSourceFactory(..) is not parameterized
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#529 - [jdbc][tck] JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#529 - [jdbc][tck] JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#529 - [jdbc][tck] JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#529 - [jdbc][tck] JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#529 - [jdbc][tck] JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#529 - [jdbc][tck] JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#529 - [jdbc][tck] JDBCTestCase fails if driver do not implement all optional methods
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#528 - [proposal][JDBC] Split the DataSourceFactory into individual interfaces
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#528 - [proposal][JDBC] Split the DataSourceFactory into individual interfaces
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#528 - [proposal][JDBC] Split the DataSourceFactory into individual interfaces
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#528 - [proposal][JDBC] Split the DataSourceFactory into individual interfaces
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#527 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#527 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#527 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#527 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#527 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#527 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#526 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#526 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#526 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#526 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#526 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#526 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#525 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#525 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#525 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#525 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#525 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#525 - Cmpn 8.1 fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#524 - context: Allow more BundleContext methods to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#524 - context: Allow more BundleContext methods to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#524 - context: Allow more BundleContext methods to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#524 - context: Allow more BundleContext methods to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#524 - context: Allow more BundleContext methods to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#524 - context: Allow more BundleContext methods to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#524 - context: Allow more BundleContext methods to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#524 - context: Allow more BundleContext methods to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#524 - context: Allow more BundleContext methods to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#524 - context: Allow more BundleContext methods to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#523 - cmpn: Fix specification formatting issues
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#523 - cmpn: Fix specification formatting issues
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#523 - cmpn: Fix specification formatting issues
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#523 - cmpn: Fix specification formatting issues
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#523 - cmpn: Fix specification formatting issues
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#523 - cmpn: Fix specification formatting issues
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#523 - cmpn: Fix specification formatting issues
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#522 - context: Allow BundleContext.getBundle() to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#522 - context: Allow BundleContext.getBundle() to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#522 - context: Allow BundleContext.getBundle() to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#522 - context: Allow BundleContext.getBundle() to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#522 - context: Allow BundleContext.getBundle() to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago
#522 - context: Allow BundleContext.getBundle() to work on a stopped context
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave almost 2 years ago