Ecosyste.ms: Issues

An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.

GitHub / osgi/osgi issues and pull requests

#559 - deploy the keystore to maven central

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 5 comments

#559 - deploy the keystore to maven central

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 5 comments

#559 - deploy the keystore to maven central

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 5 comments

#559 - deploy the keystore to maven central

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 5 comments

#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 7 comments

#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 7 comments

#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 7 comments

#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 7 comments

#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 7 comments

#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 7 comments

#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 7 comments

#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 5 comments

#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 5 comments

#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 5 comments

#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 5 comments

#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 5 comments

#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 5 comments

#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 5 comments

#556 - Add requirements and capabilities to the OSGi Feature specification

Issue - State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago - 10 comments

#556 - Add requirements and capabilities to the OSGi Feature specification

Issue - State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago - 10 comments

#556 - Add requirements and capabilities to the OSGi Feature specification

Issue - State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago - 10 comments

#556 - Add requirements and capabilities to the OSGi Feature specification

Issue - State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago - 10 comments

#556 - Add requirements and capabilities to the OSGi Feature specification

Issue - State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago - 10 comments

#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification

Issue - State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago - 2 comments

#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification

Issue - State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago - 2 comments

#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification

Issue - State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago - 2 comments

#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification

Issue - State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago - 2 comments

#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification

Issue - State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago - 2 comments

#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification

Issue - State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago - 2 comments

#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification

Issue - State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago - 2 comments

#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification

Issue - State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago - 2 comments

#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#552 - [Spec: JPA Service] Upgrade to Jakarta namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by maho7791 over 1 year ago
Labels: specification

#552 - [Spec: JPA Service] Upgrade to Jakarta namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by maho7791 over 1 year ago
Labels: specification

#552 - [Spec: JPA Service] Upgrade to Jakarta namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by maho7791 over 1 year ago
Labels: specification

#552 - [Spec: JPA Service] Upgrade to Jakarta namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by maho7791 over 1 year ago
Labels: specification

#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 28 comments

#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 28 comments

#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 28 comments

#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 28 comments

#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 28 comments

#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 28 comments

#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 28 comments

#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago - 28 comments

#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#549 - Testing fixes

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago

#549 - Testing fixes

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago

#549 - Testing fixes

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago

#549 - Testing fixes

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago

#549 - Testing fixes

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago

#549 - Testing fixes

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago

#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago

#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago

#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago

#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago

#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago

#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago

#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago

#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 3 comments

#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 3 comments

#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 3 comments

#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 3 comments

#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 3 comments

#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 3 comments

#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 3 comments

#536 - [jdbc][tck] the TCK assumes that unkown properties are ignored

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#536 - [jdbc][tck] the TCK assumes that unkown properties are ignored

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#536 - [jdbc][tck] the TCK assumes that unkown properties are ignored

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#536 - [jdbc][tck] the TCK assumes that unkown properties are ignored

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#536 - [jdbc][tck] the TCK assumes that unkown properties are ignored

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#536 - [jdbc][tck] the TCK assumes that unkown properties are ignored

Issue - State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#535 - Enable Github discussions?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago - 2 comments