Ecosyste.ms: Issues
An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.
GitHub / osgi/osgi issues and pull requests
#559 - deploy the keystore to maven central
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 5 comments
#559 - deploy the keystore to maven central
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 5 comments
#559 - deploy the keystore to maven central
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 5 comments
#559 - deploy the keystore to maven central
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 5 comments
#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 7 comments
#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 7 comments
#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 7 comments
#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 7 comments
#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 7 comments
#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 7 comments
#558 - [ds-annotation] provide an @ComponentProperty annotation
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 7 comments
#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 5 comments
#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 5 comments
#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 5 comments
#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 5 comments
#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 5 comments
#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 5 comments
#557 - [tck] OSGi Core TCKs are missing on central
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 5 comments
#556 - Add requirements and capabilities to the OSGi Feature specification
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago
- 10 comments
#556 - Add requirements and capabilities to the OSGi Feature specification
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago
- 10 comments
#556 - Add requirements and capabilities to the OSGi Feature specification
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago
- 10 comments
#556 - Add requirements and capabilities to the OSGi Feature specification
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago
- 10 comments
#556 - Add requirements and capabilities to the OSGi Feature specification
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago
- 10 comments
#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago
- 2 comments
#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago
- 2 comments
#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago
- 2 comments
#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago
- 2 comments
#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago
- 2 comments
#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago
- 2 comments
#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago
- 2 comments
#555 - Add merging to OSGi Feature specification
Issue -
State: open - Opened by bosschaert over 1 year ago
- 2 comments
#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#554 - specify osgi.feature in the osgi.identity namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#552 - [Spec: JPA Service] Upgrade to Jakarta namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by maho7791 over 1 year ago
Labels: specification
#552 - [Spec: JPA Service] Upgrade to Jakarta namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by maho7791 over 1 year ago
Labels: specification
#552 - [Spec: JPA Service] Upgrade to Jakarta namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by maho7791 over 1 year ago
Labels: specification
#552 - [Spec: JPA Service] Upgrade to Jakarta namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by maho7791 over 1 year ago
Labels: specification
#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 28 comments
#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 28 comments
#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 28 comments
#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 28 comments
#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 28 comments
#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 28 comments
#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 28 comments
#551 - [httpservice] upgrade to jakarta namespace
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
- 28 comments
#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#550 - core: Make InvalidSyntaxException a runtime exception
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
- 1 comment
#549 - Testing fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
#549 - Testing fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
#549 - Testing fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
#549 - Testing fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
#549 - Testing fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
#549 - Testing fixes
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by bjhargrave over 1 year ago
#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
#546 - Change InvalidSyntaxException to RuntimeException
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi over 1 year ago
#539 - Provide a way for projects to get a badge "OSGi Compatibility Toolkit: passing"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#539 - Provide a way for projects to get a badge "OSGi Compatibility Toolkit: passing"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#539 - Provide a way for projects to get a badge "OSGi Compatibility Toolkit: passing"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#539 - Provide a way for projects to get a badge "OSGi Compatibility Toolkit: passing"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#538 - Add a FilterBuilder to FrameworkUtil
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 3 comments
#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 3 comments
#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 3 comments
#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 3 comments
#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 3 comments
#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 3 comments
#537 - Rework the JDBC TCK
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 3 comments
#536 - [jdbc][tck] the TCK assumes that unkown properties are ignored
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#536 - [jdbc][tck] the TCK assumes that unkown properties are ignored
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#536 - [jdbc][tck] the TCK assumes that unkown properties are ignored
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#536 - [jdbc][tck] the TCK assumes that unkown properties are ignored
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#536 - [jdbc][tck] the TCK assumes that unkown properties are ignored
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#536 - [jdbc][tck] the TCK assumes that unkown properties are ignored
Issue -
State: open - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#535 - Enable Github discussions?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by laeubi almost 2 years ago
- 2 comments