Ecosyste.ms: Issues
An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.
GitHub / microsoft/autogen issues and pull requests
#3350 - feat(studio): Anthropic + AnthropicBedrock support
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by JGalego about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
Labels: alt-models, studio
#3350 - feat(studio): Anthropic + AnthropicBedrock support
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by JGalego about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
Labels: alt-models, studio
#3350 - feat(studio): Anthropic + AnthropicBedrock support
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by JGalego about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
Labels: alt-models, studio
#3350 - feat(studio): Anthropic + AnthropicBedrock support
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by JGalego about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
Labels: alt-models, studio
#3350 - feat(studio): Anthropic + AnthropicBedrock support
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by JGalego about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
Labels: alt-models, studio
#3350 - feat(studio): Anthropic + AnthropicBedrock support
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by JGalego about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
Labels: alt-models, studio
#3345 - [Bug]: OpenAI API key format
Issue -
State: open - Opened by SiriusYou about 1 month ago
- 17 comments
Labels: bug
#3345 - [Bug]: OpenAI API key format
Issue -
State: open - Opened by SiriusYou about 1 month ago
- 17 comments
Labels: bug
#3345 - [Bug]: OpenAI API key format
Issue -
State: open - Opened by SiriusYou about 1 month ago
- 17 comments
Labels: bug
#3345 - [Bug]: OpenAI API key format
Issue -
State: open - Opened by SiriusYou about 1 month ago
- 17 comments
Labels: bug
#3345 - [Bug]: OpenAI API key format
Issue -
State: open - Opened by SiriusYou about 1 month ago
- 17 comments
Labels: bug
#3345 - [Bug]: OpenAI API key format
Issue -
State: open - Opened by SiriusYou about 1 month ago
- 17 comments
Labels: bug
#3345 - [Bug]: OpenAI API key format
Issue -
State: open - Opened by SiriusYou about 1 month ago
- 17 comments
Labels: bug
#3345 - [Bug]: OpenAI API key format
Issue -
State: open - Opened by SiriusYou about 1 month ago
- 23 comments
Labels: bug
#3345 - [Bug]: OpenAI API key format
Issue -
State: open - Opened by SiriusYou about 1 month ago
- 17 comments
Labels: bug
#3345 - [Bug]: OpenAI API key format
Issue -
State: open - Opened by SiriusYou about 1 month ago
- 17 comments
Labels: bug
#3336 - Fix syntax error in user-defined-functions docs (unecessarily capital…
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by SuchitG04 about 1 month ago
#3336 - Fix syntax error in user-defined-functions docs (unecessarily capital…
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by SuchitG04 about 1 month ago
#3336 - Fix syntax error in user-defined-functions docs (unecessarily capital…
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by SuchitG04 about 1 month ago
#3336 - Fix syntax error in user-defined-functions docs (unecessarily capital…
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by SuchitG04 about 1 month ago
#3336 - Fix syntax error in user-defined-functions docs (unecessarily capital…
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by SuchitG04 about 1 month ago
#3330 - Correctly validating new real-world OpenAI API Key format, relaxing negative tests
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by nstielau about 1 month ago
- 10 comments
#3330 - Correctly validating new real-world OpenAI API Key format, relaxing negative tests
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by nstielau about 1 month ago
- 10 comments
#3330 - Correctly validating new real-world OpenAI API Key format, relaxing negative tests
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by nstielau about 1 month ago
- 10 comments
#3330 - Correctly validating new real-world OpenAI API Key format, relaxing negative tests
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by nstielau about 1 month ago
- 10 comments
#3330 - Correctly validating new real-world OpenAI API Key format, relaxing negative tests
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by nstielau about 1 month ago
- 10 comments
#3330 - Correctly validating new real-world OpenAI API Key format, relaxing negative tests
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by nstielau about 1 month ago
- 10 comments
#3330 - Correctly validating new real-world OpenAI API Key format, relaxing negative tests
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by nstielau about 1 month ago
- 10 comments
#3330 - Correctly validating new real-world OpenAI API Key format, relaxing negative tests
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by nstielau about 1 month ago
- 10 comments
#3330 - Correctly validating new real-world OpenAI API Key format, relaxing negative tests
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by nstielau about 1 month ago
- 10 comments
#3330 - Correctly validating new real-world OpenAI API Key format, relaxing negative tests
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by nstielau about 1 month ago
- 10 comments
#3330 - Correctly validating new real-world OpenAI API Key format, relaxing negative tests
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by nstielau about 1 month ago
- 10 comments
#3308 - Fixtest
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 2 comments
#3308 - Fixtest
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 2 comments
#3308 - Fixtest
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 4 comments
#3308 - Fixtest
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 2 comments
#3308 - Fixtest
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 2 comments
#3308 - Fixtest
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 2 comments
#3308 - Fixtest
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 2 comments
#3308 - Fixtest
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 2 comments
#3308 - Fixtest
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 2 comments
#3308 - Fixtest
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 2 comments
#3308 - Fixtest
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 2 comments
#3307 - [Feature]: Redacting sensitive information from Agent Response in Autogenstudio
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Git-Noob123 about 1 month ago
- 1 comment
#3307 - [Feature]: Redacting sensitive information from Agent Response in Autogenstudio
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Git-Noob123 about 1 month ago
- 1 comment
#3307 - [Feature]: Redacting sensitive information from Agent Response in Autogenstudio
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Git-Noob123 about 1 month ago
- 1 comment
#3307 - [Feature]: Redacting sensitive information from Agent Response in Autogenstudio
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Git-Noob123 about 1 month ago
- 1 comment
#3307 - [Feature]: Redacting sensitive information from Agent Response in Autogenstudio
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Git-Noob123 about 1 month ago
- 1 comment
#3307 - [Feature]: Redacting sensitive information from Agent Response in Autogenstudio
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Git-Noob123 about 1 month ago
- 1 comment
#3307 - [Feature]: Redacting sensitive information from Agent Response in Autogenstudio
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Git-Noob123 about 1 month ago
- 1 comment
#3307 - [Feature]: Redacting sensitive information from Agent Response in Autogenstudio
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Git-Noob123 about 1 month ago
- 1 comment
#3307 - [Feature]: Redacting sensitive information from Agent Response in Autogenstudio
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Git-Noob123 about 1 month ago
- 1 comment
#3307 - [Feature]: Redacting sensitive information from Agent Response in Autogenstudio
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Git-Noob123 about 1 month ago
- 1 comment
#3307 - [Feature]: Redacting sensitive information from Agent Response in Autogenstudio
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Git-Noob123 about 1 month ago
- 1 comment
#3301 - add AzureAIInference client , wrapper and test
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
#3301 - add AzureAIInference client , wrapper and test
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
#3301 - add AzureAIInference client , wrapper and test
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
#3301 - add AzureAIInference client , wrapper and test
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
#3301 - add AzureAIInference client , wrapper and test
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
#3301 - add AzureAIInference client , wrapper and test
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
#3301 - add AzureAIInference client , wrapper and test
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
#3301 - add AzureAIInference client , wrapper and test
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
#3301 - add AzureAIInference client , wrapper and test
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
#3301 - add AzureAIInference client , wrapper and test
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
#3301 - add AzureAIInference client , wrapper and test
Pull Request -
State: open - Opened by Josephrp about 1 month ago
- 5 comments
#3256 - Agenteval integration into autogenstudio
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by jluey1 about 2 months ago
- 2 comments
#3248 - [.Net][Document]: Tool call using ollama and OpenAIChatAgent
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by LittleLittleCloud about 2 months ago
- 1 comment
Labels: enhancement
#3226 - [.Net][Feature Request]: AutoGen.Ollama add tool call support
Issue -
State: open - Opened by LittleLittleCloud about 2 months ago
- 2 comments
Labels: enhancement, roadmap, AutoGen.Net
#3193 - [.Net][Feature Request]: Use Azure.AI.OpenAI v2.0 in AutoGen.OpenAI package
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by LittleLittleCloud about 2 months ago
Labels: enhancement, roadmap, AutoGen.Net, api-break-change
#3193 - [.Net][Feature Request]: Use Azure.AI.OpenAI v2.0 in AutoGen.OpenAI package
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by LittleLittleCloud about 2 months ago
Labels: enhancement, roadmap, AutoGen.Net, api-break-change
#3193 - [.Net][Feature Request]: Use Azure.AI.OpenAI v2.0 in AutoGen.OpenAI package
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by LittleLittleCloud about 2 months ago
Labels: enhancement, roadmap, AutoGen.Net, api-break-change
#3193 - [.Net][Feature Request]: Use Azure.AI.OpenAI v2.0 in AutoGen.OpenAI package
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by LittleLittleCloud about 2 months ago
Labels: enhancement, roadmap, AutoGen.Net, api-break-change
#3193 - [.Net][Feature Request]: Use Azure.AI.OpenAI v2.0 in AutoGen.OpenAI package
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by LittleLittleCloud about 2 months ago
Labels: enhancement, roadmap, AutoGen.Net, api-break-change
#3193 - [.Net][Feature Request]: Use Azure.AI.OpenAI v2.0 in AutoGen.OpenAI package
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by LittleLittleCloud about 2 months ago
Labels: enhancement, roadmap, AutoGen.Net, api-break-change
#3193 - [.Net][Feature Request]: Use Azure.AI.OpenAI v2.0 in AutoGen.OpenAI package
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by LittleLittleCloud about 2 months ago
Labels: enhancement, roadmap, AutoGen.Net, api-break-change
#3193 - [.Net][Feature Request]: Use Azure.AI.OpenAI v2.0 in AutoGen.OpenAI package
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by LittleLittleCloud about 2 months ago
Labels: enhancement, roadmap, AutoGen.Net, api-break-change
#3193 - [.Net][Feature Request]: Use Azure.AI.OpenAI v2.0 in AutoGen.OpenAI package
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by LittleLittleCloud about 2 months ago
Labels: enhancement, roadmap, AutoGen.Net, api-break-change
#3193 - [.Net][Feature Request]: Use Azure.AI.OpenAI v2.0 in AutoGen.OpenAI package
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by LittleLittleCloud about 2 months ago
Labels: enhancement, roadmap, AutoGen.Net, api-break-change
#3193 - [.Net][Feature Request]: Use Azure.AI.OpenAI v2.0 in AutoGen.OpenAI package
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by LittleLittleCloud about 2 months ago
Labels: enhancement, roadmap, AutoGen.Net, api-break-change
#3163 - [Issue]: Human Input Mode behavior different in python vs .net
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rakshitha-yalamanchili-5 2 months ago
- 2 comments
#3163 - [Issue]: Human Input Mode behavior different in python vs .net
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rakshitha-yalamanchili-5 2 months ago
- 2 comments
#3163 - [Issue]: Human Input Mode behavior different in python vs .net
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rakshitha-yalamanchili-5 2 months ago
- 2 comments
#3163 - [Issue]: Human Input Mode behavior different in python vs .net
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rakshitha-yalamanchili-5 2 months ago
- 2 comments
#3163 - [Issue]: Human Input Mode behavior different in python vs .net
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rakshitha-yalamanchili-5 2 months ago
- 2 comments
#3163 - [Issue]: Human Input Mode behavior different in python vs .net
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rakshitha-yalamanchili-5 2 months ago
- 2 comments
#3163 - [Issue]: Human Input Mode behavior different in python vs .net
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rakshitha-yalamanchili-5 2 months ago
- 2 comments
#3163 - [Issue]: Human Input Mode behavior different in python vs .net
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rakshitha-yalamanchili-5 2 months ago
- 2 comments
#3163 - [Issue]: Human Input Mode behavior different in python vs .net
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rakshitha-yalamanchili-5 2 months ago
- 2 comments
#3163 - [Issue]: Human Input Mode behavior different in python vs .net
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rakshitha-yalamanchili-5 2 months ago
- 2 comments
#3163 - [Issue]: Human Input Mode behavior different in python vs .net
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rakshitha-yalamanchili-5 2 months ago
- 2 comments
#3119 - [Roadmap]: Enhanced RAG Support
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by qingyun-wu 2 months ago
- 3 comments
Labels: roadmap
#3119 - [Roadmap]: Enhanced RAG Support
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by qingyun-wu 2 months ago
- 3 comments
Labels: roadmap
#3109 - [Bug]: For Windows users, to build the frontend, you may need alternative commands to build the frontend.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by andrei-galkin-thales 2 months ago
Labels: bug
#3109 - [Bug]: For Windows users, to build the frontend, you may need alternative commands to build the frontend.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by andrei-galkin-thales 2 months ago
Labels: bug
#3109 - [Bug]: For Windows users, to build the frontend, you may need alternative commands to build the frontend.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by andrei-galkin-thales 2 months ago
Labels: bug
#3109 - [Bug]: For Windows users, to build the frontend, you may need alternative commands to build the frontend.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by andrei-galkin-thales 2 months ago
Labels: bug
#3109 - [Bug]: For Windows users, to build the frontend, you may need alternative commands to build the frontend.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by andrei-galkin-thales 2 months ago
Labels: bug
#3109 - [Bug]: For Windows users, to build the frontend, you may need alternative commands to build the frontend.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by andrei-galkin-thales 2 months ago
Labels: bug
#3109 - [Bug]: For Windows users, to build the frontend, you may need alternative commands to build the frontend.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by andrei-galkin-thales 2 months ago
Labels: bug
#3109 - [Bug]: For Windows users, to build the frontend, you may need alternative commands to build the frontend.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by andrei-galkin-thales 2 months ago
Labels: bug