Ecosyste.ms: Issues

An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.

GitHub / jdantonio/functional-ruby issues and pull requests

#33 - Updated gem dependencies.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by jdantonio over 6 years ago

#32 - fix Protocol documentation typo

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by iarie over 6 years ago

#31 - Docs for Either seem backwards

Issue - State: closed - Opened by mmueller over 8 years ago - 2 comments

#30 - New feature ideas?

Issue - State: open - Opened by jdantonio almost 9 years ago - 3 comments

#29 - Follow conventions in either example

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by homburg almost 9 years ago - 1 comment

#28 - Fix typo

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by MaksimAbramchuk almost 9 years ago - 3 comments

#27 - more strict arguments handling, changed NoMethodError behavior

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by cvb almost 9 years ago - 2 comments

#26 - use example class in protocol spec assertion

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by abargnesi about 9 years ago - 1 comment

#25 - Better synchronization across all classes

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by jdantonio about 9 years ago

#24 - Updated min Ruby version and all required gem versions.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by jdantonio about 9 years ago

#23 - Remove require spec helper

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by rranelli over 9 years ago

#22 - Fix markdown files embedding in documentation

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by rranelli over 9 years ago - 14 comments

#21 - Support subtypes in type based pattern matching

Issue - State: closed - Opened by beezee over 9 years ago - 1 comment

#20 - Rescue in __define_method_with_matching__ obscures execution errors

Issue - State: closed - Opened by beezee over 9 years ago - 11 comments
Labels: question

#19 - Improving documentation

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by lucasallan almost 10 years ago - 1 comment

#18 - Records can be declared with a type/protocol specification for type safety.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by jdantonio almost 10 years ago

#17 - Roadmap

Issue - State: open - Opened by jdantonio almost 10 years ago - 11 comments

#16 - Test 2 concurrent ruby bug

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by jdantonio almost 10 years ago

#15 - Test of Issue #150 in the concurrent-ruby gem.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by jdantonio almost 10 years ago

#14 - Update README.md

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by elcuervo almost 10 years ago - 3 comments

#13 - Update README.md

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by elcuervo almost 10 years ago - 2 comments

#12 - Final var

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by jdantonio almost 10 years ago

#11 - Tuple

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by jdantonio almost 10 years ago

#10 - Removed Functional::Final.final_attribute due to unforseen inefficiencies

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by jdantonio almost 10 years ago

#9 - Implemented ValueStruct

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by jdantonio almost 10 years ago - 1 comment

#8 - FinalStruct

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by jdantonio almost 10 years ago

#7 - Keyword final

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by jdantonio almost 10 years ago

#6 - Removed all algorithms (collections, sort, search, etc.) classes.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by jdantonio about 10 years ago

#5 - thoughts on the new README

Issue - State: closed - Opened by 404pnf about 10 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: question

#4 - re-implement ascending? and friends, with doc and specs

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by 404pnf about 10 years ago

#3 - re-implementing ascending? and friends

Issue - State: closed - Opened by 404pnf about 10 years ago - 1 comment

#2 - using built-in Array#bsearch for collection bisect_left; bisect_right

Issue - State: closed - Opened by 404pnf about 10 years ago - 5 comments

#1 - using each_cons for collectioin ascending?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by 404pnf about 10 years ago - 2 comments