Ecosyste.ms: Issues
An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.
GitHub / janestreet/ppx_sexp_conv issues and pull requests
#40 - Recursive types break codegen
Issue -
State: open - Opened by mbacarella over 2 years ago
- 4 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#39 - [ERROR] The compilation of ppx_sexp_conv.v0.16~preview.126.09+332 failed at "dune build -p ppx_sexp_conv -j 11".
Issue -
State: open - Opened by denis631 over 2 years ago
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#38 - Redirecting to a polymorphic field?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by cmxog almost 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#37 - Ppxlib.0.26.0 compatibility
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by pitag-ha almost 3 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#36 - Suggestion: [@sexp.unboxed]
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by hackwaly about 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#35 - Issues when `None` is redefined in scope of type declaration
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by roddyyaga about 3 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#34 - `[%sexp_of: t]` expands to code that does not use `t` as a type
Issue -
State: open - Opened by jberdine over 3 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs, not-clear-what-next-step-is
#33 - Doesn't work with explicit transitive deps
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by mimoo almost 4 years ago
- 5 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#32 - Achieve compatibility with ppxlib 0.22.0
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by pitag-ha about 4 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#31 - Make ppx_sexp_conv compatible with ppxlib.0.18.0
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by NathanReb over 4 years ago
- 4 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#30 - #require doesn't work in toplevel
Issue -
State: open - Opened by yminsky almost 5 years ago
- 9 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs, not-clear-what-next-step-is
#29 - sexp grammar?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by chetmurthy almost 5 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#28 - Open variant error
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Pitometsu over 5 years ago
- 2 comments
Labels: bug, forwarded-to-js-devs
#27 - Fewer parens
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by copy about 6 years ago
- 6 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs, not-clear-what-next-step-is
#26 - Attribute format for sexp_opaque
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by peblair about 6 years ago
- 5 comments
#25 - variant type with inline record is different from "normal" records
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by eriklovlie over 6 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#24 - OPAM description doesn't mention ppx_deriving
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by mars0i almost 7 years ago
- 7 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#23 - README: How to print as sexps in utop?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by mars0i almost 7 years ago
- 6 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#22 - runtime dependency on base
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by hannesm almost 7 years ago
- 2 comments
#21 - Missing dependency?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by smondet almost 7 years ago
- 6 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs, not-clear-what-next-step-is
#20 - build failure of nocrypto.0.5.9 probably caused by `ppx_sexp_conv`
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by gasche almost 7 years ago
- 4 comments
#19 - `Sexpable` and Polymorphic variants
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by SaswatPadhi almost 7 years ago
- 3 comments
#18 - allow "-" in variant definition
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by abate about 7 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#17 - Local exception error when using ppx_sexp_conv in a Docker container
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by antoine1fr over 7 years ago
- 6 comments
#16 - Add a line regarding need to open Sexplib.Conv
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by nojb over 7 years ago
- 2 comments
#15 - "Attribute `deriving' was not used" unless ppx_jane used
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by kevinqiu over 7 years ago
- 5 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#14 - Chops off the last variant's documentation for a variant type
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by infinity0 about 8 years ago
- 11 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#13 - use correct ppx syntax in README
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by agarwal about 8 years ago
- 1 comment
#12 - Not obvious how to run tests
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by infinity0 over 8 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#11 - Doesn't work for exceptions
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by infinity0 over 8 years ago
- 9 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#10 - overloaded constructor names cause failure
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by agarwal over 8 years ago
- 6 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#9 - Support inline records of OCaml 4.03?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by liweijian over 8 years ago
- 7 comments
#8 - GADT support
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by ejgallego over 8 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs
#7 - Crash on `#require "ppx_sexp_conv"`
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by liweijian over 8 years ago
- 4 comments
#6 - Support for types with constraints
Issue -
State: open - Opened by ejgallego over 8 years ago
- 6 comments
Labels: forwarded-to-js-devs, not-clear-what-next-step-is
#5 - Doesn't work with `Int64.t`
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by rgrinberg almost 9 years ago
- 1 comment
#4 - What should I #require in utop so that it works?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by UnixJunkie almost 9 years ago
- 8 comments
#3 - type aliasing deriving is incomplete
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by ivg almost 9 years ago
- 1 comment
#2 - Doesn't compile on trunk
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by samoht about 9 years ago
#1 - Usability in utop: must manually load various stuff before using the ppx
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Armael over 9 years ago
- 13 comments