Ecosyste.ms: Issues
An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.
GitHub / fabianneuhaus/BFO issues and pull requests
#71 - [FN021] definition member_part_of
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 2 comments
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal, new axiom
#70 - [FN020] Material entities are three-dimensional entities
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: BFO Change, new axiom
#69 - exists_at vs exists during (in particular with respect to extended temporal regions)
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 3 comments
#68 - [018-003] seems too weak
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 6 comments
Labels: question
#67 - [FN019] every independent continuant has a life
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 2 comments
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal, new axiom
#66 - [FN018] linking the space occupied by an independent continuant and its life
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Change, new axiom
#65 - [FN17] lifes are existentially dependent on their independent continuants.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal, new axiom
#64 - [FN016] connecting spatial occupation and existence
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal, new axiom
#63 - bug fix in [012-002]
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Change
#62 - [FN015] weakened variant of transitivity for s-dependance
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Change, new axiom
#61 - [041-002] temporal argument
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#60 - particulars and occupies_temporal_region
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: ToDo
#59 - question concerning [099-001]
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 2 comments
Labels: question
#58 - Continuant
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: ToDo
#57 - [FN014] an occurrent occupies a unique spatiotemporal_region
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal, new axiom
#56 - temporally_projects_onto vs. occupies_temporal_region
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 2 comments
Labels: BFO Change
#55 - temporally_projects_onto [080-004] vs. projects_onto [098-001]
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 5 comments
Labels: BFO Change
#54 - [FN013-001] -- There is no first and last temporal interval
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: new axiom
#53 - [FN012], [FN013] more axioms for time points
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: new axiom
#52 - [FN010] + [FN011] Axioms to ensure correlation between 4D and time
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: BFO Change, new axiom
#51 - section 3.15
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: BFO Change
#50 - change status of [101-002] to theorem
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: BFO Change
#49 - [FN009] "All temporal regions are either 0D or 1D
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: new axiom
#48 - [108-001] uniqueness
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
#47 - axiomatize occupies_spatiotemporal_region
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: ToDo
#46 - Clarification question [098-001]
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#45 - [099-001] clarification needed
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: question
#44 - add project_onto.
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
#43 - [096-002] is not an axiom, but a theorem
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Change
#42 - Add subcategories fragmented and contigous One Dimensional Temporal Region"
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 2 comments
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal
#41 - FN008 Mutually dependent entities, also depend on something else (non-mutually)
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 2 comments
Labels: BFO Change, new axiom
#40 - Change [129-001] to [129-002]
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal
#39 - [FN007] mutually dependent continuants exist at the same time
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal, new axiom
#38 - Remove theorem [013-002]
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal
#37 - [FN006] s-dependence is passed along parthood
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: new axiom
#36 - Inconsistency because Transitivity of s-depends
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#35 - Are the following statements true?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: question
#34 - b is not a boundary of c and b is not a site of which c is the host [64]. [012-002]]
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: ToDo
#33 - [012-002] domain and range of s-depends_on
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#32 - temporal argument in s-depends_on redundant
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: question, BFO Spec Change Proposal
#31 - axiomatize occupies
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: ToDo
#30 - [008-002] Persistence (p 19)
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: ToDo
#29 - [126-001] is redundant and can be removed
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal
#28 - [009-002] is redundant and can be removed
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal
#27 - [FN005] assign label to has_proper_occurrent_part definition on page 19
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
#27 - [FN005] assign label to has_proper_occurrent_part definition on page 19
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
#26 - [FN004] assign label to has_proper_continuant_part definition on page 18
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
#25 - [FN003] occurrent_part_of entails existence of the occurrents at the same time
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal, new axiom
#24 - No sum in the mereologies?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: question
#23 - part_of_at in 002-001 and part_of in 003-002
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: question
#22 - 111-002 is no theorem.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal
#21 - Terminology in section 2.9
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal
#20 - What is the difference between a defined class and a specialization?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal
#19 - parthood entails existence [FN002-001]
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal, new axiom
#18 - bug in [111-002]
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal
#17 - bug in [122-001]?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 2 comments
#16 - Every entity exists during some temporal region. [FN001-001]
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal, new axiom
#15 - types vs universals?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#14 - Make disjointness in taxonomy explicit.
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Change
#13 - why is there no "complete process" in Fig1?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: BFO Change
#12 - axiomatize memberOf@
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: review later
#11 - Figure 1
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: BFO Change
#10 - defined class in taxonomy?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
#9 - Rename Entity to Particular?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: BFO Spec Change Proposal
#8 - Exhaustiveness of Continuant or Occurrent?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
#7 - Add disjointness axioms to taxonomy
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: ToDo
#6 - Exhaustiveness of universal/particular
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question
#5 - instantiation at a time?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
#4 - add tracking number to "Entities can be divided into instances and universals"
Issue -
State: open - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: BFO Change
#3 - particular or instance?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: question
#2 - universal or type
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
Labels: question
#1 - disjointness in taxonomy?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by fabianneuhaus over 10 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: question