Ecosyste.ms: Issues

An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.

GitHub / dibyendumajumdar/dmr_c issues and pull requests

#34 - Avoid using long type

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 6 years ago

#33 - Refactor code to avoid simplification

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 6 years ago

#32 - Add a build option that only includes the preprocessor and C parser

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 6 years ago
Labels: enhancement

#31 - Create new JIT backend using Eclipse OMR technology

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 6 years ago
Labels: enhancement, WIP, OMR-Backend

#30 - Error Building without a backend

Issue - State: closed - Opened by QuestionPython almost 7 years ago - 4 comments
Labels: bug

#29 - Remove experimental newssa implementation

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar almost 7 years ago

#28 - Merge pseudo with size patch by Chris Lee

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar almost 7 years ago - 1 comment

#27 - NanoJIT backend: call NJX api to get a reference to function parameters

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar about 7 years ago
Labels: bug, NanoJIT-Backend

#27 - NanoJIT backend: call NJX api to get a reference to function parameters

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar about 7 years ago
Labels: bug, NanoJIT-Backend

#26 - NanoJIT backend fails on AND_BOOL instruction

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar about 7 years ago
Labels: bug

#26 - NanoJIT backend fails on AND_BOOL instruction

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar about 7 years ago
Labels: bug

#25 - NanoJIT backend fails with assertion error on CBR instruction

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar about 7 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#24 - Bug in the conversion of a symbol type in switch condition

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar about 7 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug, NanoJIT-Backend

#24 - Bug in the conversion of a symbol type in switch condition

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar about 7 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug, NanoJIT-Backend

#23 - A conditional branch may be omitted by NanoJIT

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar about 7 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug, NanoJIT-Backend

#23 - A conditional branch may be omitted by NanoJIT

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar about 7 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug, NanoJIT-Backend

#22 - Missing liveness information causes stack being over-written

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar about 7 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug, NanoJIT-Backend

#22 - Missing liveness information causes stack being over-written

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar about 7 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug, NanoJIT-Backend

#20 - Reinstate type specific ptr list

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: WIP, technical debt

#20 - Reinstate type specific ptr list

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: WIP, technical debt

#19 - Change the LLVM api to accept a Module

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago - 1 comment

#19 - Change the LLVM api to accept a Module

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago - 1 comment

#18 - Add the ability to compile a buffer

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: enhancement, LLVM-Backend

#18 - Add the ability to compile a buffer

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: enhancement, LLVM-Backend

#17 - showsymbols mapping of type modifiers is incorrect

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago - 1 comment

#16 - showsymbols output XML needs a root element

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago - 1 comment

#16 - showsymbols output XML needs a root element

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago - 1 comment

#15 - Create an X86_64 backend using NanoJIT

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: NanoJIT-Backend, WIP

#15 - Create an X86_64 backend using NanoJIT

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: NanoJIT-Backend, WIP

#14 - Variable argument handling is incorrect

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: bug, Linearizer, LLVM-Backend

#14 - Variable argument handling is incorrect

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: bug, Linearizer, LLVM-Backend

#13 - Make the sparse-llvm interface available as a library interface

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: LLVM-Backend

#13 - Make the sparse-llvm interface available as a library interface

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: LLVM-Backend

#12 - The llvm backend does not handle assignment of aggregate types

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: KnownLimitation, LLVM-Backend

#12 - The llvm backend does not handle assignment of aggregate types

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: KnownLimitation, LLVM-Backend

#10 - Array size where the size is computed through the initializer is not handled correctly by sparse-llvm

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: bug, LLVM-Backend

#10 - Array size where the size is computed through the initializer is not handled correctly by sparse-llvm

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: bug, LLVM-Backend

#9 - Linearizer outputs incorrect code if a variable is initialized inside a branch

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: bug, KnownLimitation, Linearizer

#9 - Linearizer outputs incorrect code if a variable is initialized inside a branch

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: bug, KnownLimitation, Linearizer

#8 - Variables must be initialized before use else compilation may fail

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: KnownLimitation, LLVM-Backend

#8 - Variables must be initialized before use else compilation may fail

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: KnownLimitation, LLVM-Backend

#7 - (*)() function pointer call syntax is not handled correctly

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: bug, KnownLimitation, Linearizer

#7 - (*)() function pointer call syntax is not handled correctly

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: bug, KnownLimitation, Linearizer

#6 - Initializers of local / global static variables not fully supported

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: KnownLimitation, LLVM-Backend

#6 - Initializers of local / global static variables not fully supported

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar over 7 years ago
Labels: KnownLimitation, LLVM-Backend

#5 - Create an X86-64 backend using asmjit

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar almost 8 years ago
Labels: wontfix

#5 - Create an X86-64 backend using asmjit

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar almost 8 years ago
Labels: wontfix

#4 - The linearizer outputs OP_CAST instead of OP_PTRCAST

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar almost 8 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#4 - The linearizer outputs OP_CAST instead of OP_PTRCAST

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar almost 8 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#3 - Sparse-LLVM attempts to put wrong type on PSEUDO_VAL

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar almost 8 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: bug

#3 - Sparse-LLVM attempts to put wrong type on PSEUDO_VAL

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar almost 8 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: bug

#2 - Review error handling to avoid program termination on error

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar almost 8 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: LLVM-Backend

#2 - Review error handling to avoid program termination on error

Issue - State: open - Opened by dibyendumajumdar almost 8 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: LLVM-Backend

#1 - Work out how to avoid global allocator for ptr_list nodes

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar almost 8 years ago - 2 comments

#1 - Work out how to avoid global allocator for ptr_list nodes

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dibyendumajumdar almost 8 years ago - 2 comments