daostack/access_control issues and pull requests

#44 - new release + docs + publish on ci

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim almost 6 years ago

#43 - Publish to NPM

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tarrencev almost 6 years ago - 2 comments

#42 - rm ANYTHING and lockId

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim almost 6 years ago

#41 - Prepare for EIP submission

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman almost 6 years ago

#40 - Changed uint80 to uint

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago

#39 - uint80 is more expansive on read(unlock) and cheaper in write(lock) re uint256

Issue - State: closed - Opened by orenyodfat about 6 years ago - 3 comments

#38 - Groups

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 9 comments
Labels: enhancement

#37 - House keeping

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago
Labels: enhancement

#36 - should `isValidExpiration` be public?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: question

#35 - Start time

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: enhancement

#34 - Usage example + convenience methods

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: documentation

#33 - In addition to `expiration`, have a `startTime`

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: enhancement

#32 - ANYTHING is unnecessary

Issue - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago - 8 comments

#31 - Add test for the ANYTHING property

Issue - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago - 2 comments

#30 - Formalize a language and interpreter for defining the lock criterion

Issue - State: open - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago - 7 comments
Labels: enhancement

#29 - Non revoke-able keys

Issue - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago - 5 comments

#28 - Making an EIP

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago
Labels: documentation

#27 - Blog post

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago
Labels: documentation

#26 - Documentation

Issue - State: open - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago
Labels: documentation

#25 - Examples

Issue - State: open - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago
Labels: documentation

#24 - Fixed mistake in test case

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago - 1 comment

#23 - Modularized the Interface

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago - 7 comments

#22 - Cleanup

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 9 comments
Labels: enhancement

#21 - Added tests

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago - 1 comment

#20 - Moved ProtectedController to test directory

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago

#19 - ANYTHING constant should be changed

Issue - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago - 2 comments

#18 - Merge Travis from development to master

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago - 2 comments

#17 - Why toBytes function is needed at protected.sol ?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by orenyodfat about 6 years ago - 3 comments

#16 - Remove import math.sol from Protected.sol

Issue - State: closed - Opened by orenyodfat about 6 years ago - 3 comments

#15 - Added Travis CI

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago

#14 - Make `expiration` and `uses` each 127 bit so that the entire key can fit in a single 256 bit word

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 9 comments
Labels: enhancement

#13 - Think more about the `Use` event

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: question

#12 - Allow revoking a lock id

Issue - State: open - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: enhancement

#11 - Solve capability escalation problem

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago - 9 comments

#10 - Multiple Keys Management

Issue - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago - 5 comments

#9 - `expiration` should be a block number instead of timestamp

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: enhancement

#8 - key can be used twice if specified in more than one `only`

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#7 - `only` with array literal won't compile

Issue - State: closed - Opened by ben-kaufman about 6 years ago - 2 comments

#6 - Import code from Arc and make it compile

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago
Labels: task

#5 - Use the contract as a service pattern

Issue - State: open - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: enhancement

#4 - Implement EIP165

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: enhancement

#3 - Solve capability escalation issue

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: enhancement

#2 - How to allow users to specify the key?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: question

#1 - Research on similar ideas

Issue - State: closed - Opened by tsuberim about 6 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: research

GitHub / daostack/access_control issues and pull requests