cicomponents/cicomponents issues and pull requests

#28 - Problem: Karaf 4.0.7 is outdated

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk almost 8 years ago

#27 - Problem: OutputProvider implementation for output stream is finicky

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#27 - Problem: OutputProvider implementation for output stream is finicky

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#26 - Problem: no easy way to share outputs over web

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#26 - Problem: no easy way to share outputs over web

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#25 - Problem: GitHub PR hook will wait until emitters are done

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#25 - Problem: GitHub PR hook will wait until emitters are done

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#25 - Problem: GitHub PR hook will wait until emitters are done

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#24 - Problem: GitRevisionEmitter and corresponding listeners are not tested

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#24 - Problem: GitRevisionEmitter and corresponding listeners are not tested

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#24 - Problem: GitRevisionEmitter and corresponding listeners are not tested

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#24 - Problem: GitRevisionEmitter and corresponding listeners are not tested

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#23 - Problem: AbstractResourceEmitter emits resources sequentially

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#23 - Problem: AbstractResourceEmitter emits resources sequentially

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#23 - Problem: AbstractResourceEmitter emits resources sequentially

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#23 - Problem: AbstractResourceEmitter emits resources sequentially

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#22 - Problem: existing PersistentMap implementations are subtly non-conformant

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#22 - Problem: existing PersistentMap implementations are subtly non-conformant

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#22 - Problem: existing PersistentMap implementations are subtly non-conformant

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#21 - Add a Gitter chat badge to README.md

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by gitter-badger over 8 years ago

#21 - Add a Gitter chat badge to README.md

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by gitter-badger over 8 years ago

#21 - Add a Gitter chat badge to README.md

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by gitter-badger over 8 years ago

#21 - Add a Gitter chat badge to README.md

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by gitter-badger over 8 years ago

#20 - Problem: map:list makes it see the state of the map

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#20 - Problem: map:list makes it see the state of the map

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#20 - Problem: map:list makes it see the state of the map

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#20 - Problem: map:list makes it see the state of the map

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#19 - Problem: Kryo includes ASM dependency which is already provided by Karaf

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#19 - Problem: Kryo includes ASM dependency which is already provided by Karaf

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#19 - Problem: Kryo includes ASM dependency which is already provided by Karaf

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#19 - Problem: Kryo includes ASM dependency which is already provided by Karaf

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#18 - Problem: servlets are blocking on long operations

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#18 - Problem: servlets are blocking on long operations

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#18 - Problem: servlets are blocking on long operations

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#18 - Problem: servlets are blocking on long operations

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#17 - Problem: no easy, conventional way to indicate the status of the build

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#17 - Problem: no easy, conventional way to indicate the status of the build

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#17 - Problem: no easy, conventional way to indicate the status of the build

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#17 - Problem: no easy, conventional way to indicate the status of the build

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#16 - Problem: SimpleFilePersistentMap doesn't work with certain keys

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#16 - Problem: SimpleFilePersistentMap doesn't work with certain keys

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#16 - Problem: SimpleFilePersistentMap doesn't work with certain keys

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#16 - Problem: SimpleFilePersistentMap doesn't work with certain keys

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#15 - Problem: writing build.gradle or pom.xml for a CI might be hard for uninitiated

Issue - State: open - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#15 - Problem: writing build.gradle or pom.xml for a CI might be hard for uninitiated

Issue - State: open - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#15 - Problem: writing build.gradle or pom.xml for a CI might be hard for uninitiated

Issue - State: open - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#15 - Problem: writing build.gradle or pom.xml for a CI might be hard for uninitiated

Issue - State: open - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#14 - Problem: AbstractResourceEmitter stops logging even if no listeners were added

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#14 - Problem: AbstractResourceEmitter stops logging even if no listeners were added

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#14 - Problem: AbstractResourceEmitter stops logging even if no listeners were added

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#14 - Problem: AbstractResourceEmitter stops logging even if no listeners were added

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#14 - Problem: AbstractResourceEmitter stops logging even if no listeners were added

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#14 - Problem: AbstractResourceEmitter stops logging even if no listeners were added

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#13 - Problem: PersistentMap#getMapForBundle() is cumbersome

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#13 - Problem: PersistentMap#getMapForBundle() is cumbersome

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#13 - Problem: PersistentMap#getMapForBundle() is cumbersome

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#13 - Problem: PersistentMap#getMapForBundle() is cumbersome

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#13 - Problem: PersistentMap#getMapForBundle() is cumbersome

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#13 - Problem: PersistentMap#getMapForBundle() is cumbersome

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#13 - Problem: PersistentMap#getMapForBundle() is cumbersome

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#12 - Problem: PersistentMap use of Serializable doesn't work

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#12 - Problem: PersistentMap use of Serializable doesn't work

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#12 - Problem: PersistentMap use of Serializable doesn't work

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#12 - Problem: PersistentMap use of Serializable doesn't work

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#12 - Problem: PersistentMap use of Serializable doesn't work

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#11 - Problem: PersistentMap use of Serializable doesn't work for non standard-library classes

Issue - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago - 1 comment

#11 - Problem: PersistentMap use of Serializable doesn't work for non standard-library classes

Issue - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago - 1 comment

#11 - Problem: PersistentMap use of Serializable doesn't work for non standard-library classes

Issue - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago - 1 comment

#11 - Problem: PersistentMap use of Serializable doesn't work for non standard-library classes

Issue - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago - 1 comment

#11 - Problem: PersistentMap use of Serializable doesn't work for non standard-library classes

Issue - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago - 1 comment

#11 - Problem: PersistentMap use of Serializable doesn't work for non standard-library classes

Issue - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago - 1 comment

#11 - Problem: PersistentMap use of Serializable doesn't work for non standard-library classes

Issue - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago - 1 comment

#10 - Problem: hard to figure out how to start using CI Components

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#10 - Problem: hard to figure out how to start using CI Components

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#10 - Problem: hard to figure out how to start using CI Components

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#10 - Problem: hard to figure out how to start using CI Components

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#10 - Problem: hard to figure out how to start using CI Components

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#9 - Problem: Resource#acquire() and #close() names are not matching

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#9 - Problem: Resource#acquire() and #close() names are not matching

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#9 - Problem: Resource#acquire() and #close() names are not matching

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#9 - Problem: Resource#acquire() and #close() names are not matching

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#8 - Problem: SimpleFilePersistentMap doesn't work with certain keys

Issue - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago
Labels: bug

#8 - Problem: SimpleFilePersistentMap doesn't work with certain keys

Issue - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago
Labels: bug

#7 - Problem: CI's Build#deactivate removes listeners on deactivation

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#7 - Problem: CI's Build#deactivate removes listeners on deactivation

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#7 - Problem: CI's Build#deactivate removes listeners on deactivation

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#7 - Problem: CI's Build#deactivate removes listeners on deactivation

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#7 - Problem: CI's Build#deactivate removes listeners on deactivation

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#7 - Problem: CI's Build#deactivate removes listeners on deactivation

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#6 - Problem: PullRequestMonitor doesn't memorize commits it has seen

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#6 - Problem: PullRequestMonitor doesn't memorize commits it has seen

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#6 - Problem: PullRequestMonitor doesn't memorize commits it has seen

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#6 - Problem: PullRequestMonitor doesn't memorize commits it has seen

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#6 - Problem: PullRequestMonitor doesn't memorize commits it has seen

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#5 - Problem: no introspection into PersistentMap

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#5 - Problem: no introspection into PersistentMap

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#5 - Problem: no introspection into PersistentMap

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#5 - Problem: no introspection into PersistentMap

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#5 - Problem: no introspection into PersistentMap

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

#5 - Problem: no introspection into PersistentMap

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by yrashk over 8 years ago

GitHub / cicomponents/cicomponents issues and pull requests