cdisc-org/cdisc-rules-engine issues and pull requests

#364 - Make test endpoint sync

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by nhaydel almost 2 years ago

#363 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-12 - asyncio.run() cannot be called from a running event loop

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago - 7 comments
Labels: bug, jira reconciled

#362 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-1676 (2)

Issue - State: open - Opened by JDenHerder almost 2 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: enhancement, ADaM, Rule Blocked

#361 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-1676

Issue - State: open - Opened by JDenHerder almost 2 years ago
Labels: bug, ADaM, Rule Blocked

#360 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-1646

Issue - State: open - Opened by FITZPST almost 2 years ago
Labels: enhancement, ADaM, Rule Blocked

#359 - Handle case where all output variables are not present in the dataset

Issue - State: open - Opened by nhaydel almost 2 years ago
Labels: bug

#358 - Update report template and test reporting issues

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by nhaydel almost 2 years ago - 1 comment

#357 - TypeError: Validation_args.new() missing 1 required positional argument: 'progress'

Issue - State: closed - Opened by JozefAerts almost 2 years ago - 9 comments
Labels: jira reconciled

#346 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-11 - find duplicate records

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: enhancement, define cross check, jira reconciled

#345 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-11 - merge parents with supps

Issue - State: open - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago - 7 comments
Labels: enhancement, define cross check, jira reconciled, Rule Blocked

#344 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-11 - get key variables

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago - 4 comments
Labels: enhancement, define cross check, jira reconciled

#342 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-360

Issue - State: closed - Opened by JozefAerts almost 2 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: bug, define cross check, Rule Blocked

#341 - No module named odmlib.define_2_1.model when running compiled engine without specifiying define version

Issue - State: closed - Opened by nhaydel almost 2 years ago
Labels: bug, define cross check, jira reconciled

#338 - Create prod environment for test endpoint

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago

#335 - Move Rule Schema from Rules Editor to Core Rules Engine repo

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: jira reconciled

#333 - Test Endpoint support rules involving Library Standards and Codelists

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: enhancement, jira reconciled

#331 - Test Endpoint support Define.xml files

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: enhancement, define cross check, jira reconciled

#329 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-286

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: enhancement, jira reconciled

#328 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-287

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: enhancement, jira reconciled

#327 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-287

Issue - State: closed - Opened by apalmercdisc almost 2 years ago
Labels: bug, jira reconciled

#324 - Reporting template enhancement

Issue - State: closed - Opened by nickdedonder almost 2 years ago - 4 comments
Labels: enhancement, jira reconciled

#320 - Test data causing 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get'

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago - 4 comments
Labels: bug, jira reconciled

#317 - Merge development

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by nhaydel almost 2 years ago

#316 - Data location has mixed path separators in report's Conformance Details

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago
Labels: bug, jira reconciled

#315 - Move cdisc-library-conformance-rules-generator to Github

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago
Labels: jira reconciled

#314 - Data location not showing all datasources in report's Conformance Details

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: enhancement, jira reconciled

#306 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for collected variables so that I can stay compliant with CG0015

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: enhancement, define cross check, jira reconciled

#305 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study define.xml against metadata in CDISC Library for inconsistent variable role so that I can stay compliant with CG0010

Issue - State: open - Opened by chowsanthony almost 2 years ago - 5 comments
Labels: enhancement, define cross check

#304 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for non-collected or derived --DUR so that I can stay compliant with CG0002, CG0015

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony almost 2 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: enhancement, define cross check, jira reconciled

#303 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for missing def:IsNonStandard attribute for standard domains or datasets so that I can stay compliant with CG0001

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony almost 2 years ago
Labels: bug, define cross check, jira reconciled

#302 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for inconsistent use of def:IsNonStandard attribute for standard domains or datasets so that I can stay compliant with CG0312

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony almost 2 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: enhancement, define cross check, jira reconciled

#299 - Handle case where executability is provided as None

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by nhaydel almost 2 years ago

#297 - PDF files in folder with XPT files cause validator to crash

Issue - State: closed - Opened by JozefAerts almost 2 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: duplicate, jira reconciled

#296 - Stange define.xml error "ValueError: Missing required keyword argument _content in FormalExpression"

Issue - State: closed - Opened by JozefAerts almost 2 years ago - 12 comments
Labels: bug, question, define cross check, jira reconciled

#295 - validator crashes when def:Structure is absent in the define.xml

Issue - State: closed - Opened by JozefAerts almost 2 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: bug, define cross check

#294 - validation report (Excel, JSON): also provide text of rule under "Rules Report"

Issue - State: closed - Opened by JozefAerts almost 2 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: bug, jira reconciled

#293 - Null Executability causes the engine to crash

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: bug, jira reconciled

#292 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-1691

Issue - State: open - Opened by FITZPST almost 2 years ago
Labels: enhancement, ADaM, Rule Blocked

#291 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-1637

Issue - State: open - Opened by FITZPST almost 2 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: enhancement, ADaM, Rule Blocked

#290 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-1636

Issue - State: open - Opened by FITZPST almost 2 years ago
Labels: enhancement, ADaM, Rule Blocked

#287 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for inconsistent use of the HasNoData attribute

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony almost 2 years ago - 5 comments
Labels: define cross check, jira reconciled

#286 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for missing a topic variable in a custom general observation class dataset so that I can stay compliant with CG0320 (Findings), CG0463 (Interventions), CG0464 (Events)

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony almost 2 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: define cross check, jira reconciled

#285 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for permissible variable not present in the dataset when it has no data and is planned to be collected so that I can stay compliant with CG0651

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony almost 2 years ago
Labels: define cross check, jira reconciled

#284 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for when CMTRT's source is not collected so that I can stay compliant with CG0097

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony almost 2 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: define cross check, jira reconciled

#282 - Option name 'p' assigned to two different options poolsize and progress in core.py file

Issue - State: closed - Opened by RamilCDISC almost 2 years ago
Labels: bug, jira reconciled

#281 - Add variable permissibility operations

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by nhaydel almost 2 years ago

#280 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-21

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion almost 2 years ago
Labels: bug, jira reconciled

#279 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-203 CORERULES-204

Issue - State: closed - Opened by apalmercdisc almost 2 years ago
Labels: enhancement, jira reconciled

#278 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for invalid units for normalized test parameters such as PK so that I can stay compliant with CG0556, CG0557, CG0559, CG0560

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony almost 2 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: define cross check, jira reconciled

#276 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-CG0351

Issue - State: closed - Opened by apalmercdisc about 2 years ago
Labels: enhancement, jira reconciled

#275 - Rule blocked: CORERULES-206 CORERULES-435

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gerrycampion about 2 years ago
Labels: enhancement, jira reconciled

#274 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against my study for values in VLM not found in user-defined codelist so that I can stay compliant with SD1228

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: define cross check, jira reconciled, fda

#273 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against my study for values not found in user-defined codelist so that I can stay compliant with SD0037

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: define cross check, jira reconciled, fda

#272 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study define.xml against the IG for variables with missing/incorrect CDISC CT so that I can stay compliant with SEND 7

Issue - State: open - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago
Labels: define cross check, SEND

#271 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for variable length mismatch so that I can stay compliant with SD1231

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 4 comments
Labels: define cross check, jira reconciled

#266 - Abstact Dataset Builders

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by nhaydel about 2 years ago

#265 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check study data against that the study define.xml for mismatching variable ordering so that I can fix the issue

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 5 comments
Labels: define cross check, jira reconciled

#264 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check external dictionary version indicator against that in the define.xml so that the proper dictionary source files are used as input

Issue - State: open - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: define cross check

#263 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check dataset variable against individual LOINC components so that I can stay compliant with CG0400

Issue - State: open - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago
Labels: define cross check

#261 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check dataset variable against individual MedDRA components so that I can stay compliant with SD0008/SD0008C, SD1114/SD1114C, SD2007, SD2009, SD2010/SD2010C, SD2011, SD2012/SD2012C, SD2013, SD2014, SD2015, SD2016

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 4 comments
Labels: define cross check

#260 - As VALIDATOR, I want to check variable origin in the define.xml contains invalid value so that I can stay compliant with SEND 8

Issue - State: open - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: SEND

#259 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against both the study define.xml and SENDIG for mismatching dataset variable labels so that I can stay compliant with SEND 6.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: define cross check, SEND

#258 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for mismatching dataset variable labels so that I can stay compliant with SD1324

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: define cross check, jira reconciled

#257 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for lack of comments or not indicating no data for expected variables that are always null so that I meet the business rule stated in the Define-XML specifications

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: define cross check

#256 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for null values in variables that are mandatory so that I can stay compliant with SD1229

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: define cross check

#255 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check the study define.xml against the SENDIG for mismatching variables so that I can stay compliant with SEND 5

Issue - State: open - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: define cross check, SEND

#254 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for missing variables so that I can stay compliant with SD0054 & SD0060

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: define cross check

#253 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for mismatching dataset labels so that I can stay compliant with SD1325

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: define cross check, jira reconciled

#252 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for missing datasets so that I can stay compliant with SD1063

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: define cross check, jira reconciled

#251 - As VALIDATOR, I want to cross-check my study data against the study define.xml for missing domains so that I can stay compliant with SD0061

Issue - State: closed - Opened by chowsanthony about 2 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: define cross check, jira reconciled

#171 - is_not_ordered_set generates either one error (when Sensivity=Dataset) or error for each record (Sensitivity=Record)

Issue - State: open - Opened by JozefAerts over 2 years ago
Labels: bug, SEND

#168 - not_exists for variable presence only works when there is a second variable check

Issue - State: closed - Opened by JozefAerts over 2 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: bug, SEND, jira reconciled, Rule Blocked

GitHub / cdisc-org/cdisc-rules-engine issues and pull requests