Ecosyste.ms: Issues
An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.
GitHub / asc-community/GenericTensor issues and pull requests
#39 - Null reference warnings to fix
Issue -
State: open - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 2 years ago
Labels: good first issue
#38 - Fix 0D tensors
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Happypig375 over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#37 - Adding `ForEach`
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#36 - `Iterate` to return state machine object
Issue -
State: open - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
Labels: proposal
#35 - Adding fold...
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 2 years ago
- 1 comment
#34 - Fix iterating empty tensors
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Happypig375 over 2 years ago
#33 - Be consistent with other constructors and allow 0 widths and heights
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Happypig375 over 2 years ago
- 2 comments
#32 - Fix empty volume with nonzero dimensions
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Happypig375 over 2 years ago
#31 - [WIP] GenericTensor 2.0 API Design
Issue -
State: open - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 2 years ago
- 2 comments
Labels: Opinions wanted, proposal
#30 - Will this package support MKL or OpenBlas as backend to accelerate matrix inverse computing speed
Issue -
State: open - Opened by xichaoqiang almost 3 years ago
- 1 comment
#29 - Is there any fft or SVD function in this package?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by xichaoqiang almost 3 years ago
- 1 comment
#28 - Inverting a matrix twice causes the program to get stuck
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Julpe about 3 years ago
- 1 comment
#27 - GenericTensor 2.0
Issue -
State: open - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 3 years ago
- 3 comments
Labels: Opinions wanted, proposal
#26 - Add LU and PLU decompositions.
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by TheSeems over 3 years ago
- 1 comment
#25 - Error for single-element matrix inverse
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 3 years ago
Labels: bug
#24 - New inverse algorithm?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 3 years ago
Labels: proposal
#23 - No exceptions?
Issue -
State: open - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 3 years ago
#22 - Wrong inverse
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 3 years ago
Labels: bug
#21 - Linear transformations
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose almost 4 years ago
- 1 comment
#20 - Interpreted Linq.Expression or loops/NativeAOT mode
Issue -
State: open - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose almost 4 years ago
Labels: proposal
#19 - Reduced Row Echelon Form
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose almost 4 years ago
Labels: proposal
#18 - GenericTensorException
Issue -
State: open - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose about 4 years ago
Labels: proposal
#17 - Tests and readme
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 4 years ago
#16 - Codecov 2
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 4 years ago
#15 - Codecov >:|
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 4 years ago
#14 - Possible improvements
Issue -
State: open - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 4 years ago
#13 - Optimizations & got rid of forward
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 4 years ago
#12 - A little optimization
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 4 years ago
#11 - New approach
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 4 years ago
#10 - Report
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 4 years ago
#9 - Document why Forward is needed
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by Happypig375 over 4 years ago
- 4 comments
#8 - Wrong number
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Happypig375 over 4 years ago
#7 - ToString shouldn't be called from objects directly
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 4 years ago
Labels: bug
#6 - Nullables
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by Happypig375 over 4 years ago
- 12 comments
#5 - Do we need arithmetic operators to be defined?
Issue -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 4 years ago
Labels: Opinions wanted
#4 - No wrapper needed now
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 4 years ago
#3 - optimizing project performace
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by MomoDeve over 4 years ago
#2 - Subtensor
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 4 years ago
#1 - Subtensor
Pull Request -
State: closed - Opened by WhiteBlackGoose over 4 years ago