Ecosyste.ms: Issues

An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.

GitHub / active-group/active-clojure issues and pull requests

#48 - Clojurescript rtd-records with more than 20 elemens

Issue - State: open - Opened by dobretzberger over 1 year ago

#47 - Update breaking changes in README

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by neshtea over 2 years ago

#46 - Update breaking changes in README

Issue - State: closed - Opened by neshtea over 2 years ago
Labels: documentation

#45 - Implement sequence-of in terms of sequence

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by smoes over 2 years ago

#44 - Add assertions to validations

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by smoes over 2 years ago

#43 - Applicative validation

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by neshtea over 2 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: enhancement

#42 - Minor fixes of documentation

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by chriz-active over 2 years ago

#41 - Equality checks differ between regular and rtd-records.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by neshtea almost 3 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug, enhancement

#40 - RTD-Records emit a warning when using vars that are already defined

Issue - State: closed - Opened by neshtea almost 3 years ago
Labels: bug

#39 - Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'equals') when using cljs >= 1.10.896

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dobretzberger almost 3 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#38 - Question & Hint @possible copy/paste/oversight bug

Issue - State: closed - Opened by joehannes over 3 years ago - 4 comments

#37 - Dispatch on RTD-records

Issue - State: closed - Opened by neshtea over 3 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: enhancement

#35 - Sum types break on reload of non-generative records

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dfrese over 4 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: bug

#34 - Records constructed with missing arguments look equal, but aren't

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dfrese over 4 years ago - 3 comments
Labels: bug

#33 - Sum types with aliases

Issue - State: open - Opened by dfrese over 4 years ago - 5 comments
Labels: enhancement

#32 - [sum types] More debugging info

Issue - State: closed - Opened by kaaninho over 4 years ago - 2 comments

#31 - Impossible to have rtd-records with 7 fields

Issue - State: closed - Opened by smoes over 4 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: bug

#30 - `constructor` as a field name in clojurescript records messes up

Issue - State: closed - Opened by smoes over 4 years ago - 2 comments

#29 - Test that issue #28 is fixed.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by cresh almost 5 years ago

#28 - Fields in selectors should match constructor arguments

Issue - State: closed - Opened by neshtea almost 5 years ago - 6 comments

#27 - Constructor arguments not being assigned to an accessor should cause syntax errors

Issue - State: closed - Opened by smoes almost 5 years ago - 1 comment

#26 - `default` as a field name doesn't work in ClojureScript

Issue - State: closed - Opened by kaaninho about 5 years ago - 3 comments

#25 - Get rid of warnings during compilation

Issue - State: open - Opened by smoes about 5 years ago - 2 comments

#24 - Improve lens performance

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by kenranunderscore over 5 years ago

#23 - records: Cljs records with at least one field fail on `keys` function

Issue - State: closed - Opened by smoes over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#22 - records: Metadata should be passed/inherited to generated symbols

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dfrese over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#21 - Debugging metadata generated via macro `monadic` is broken

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dfrese over 5 years ago

#20 - Monadic macro 7x performance hit

Issue - State: closed - Opened by markusschlegel over 5 years ago

#19 - Compiler warning in record.cljc with clojurescript

Issue - State: closed - Opened by dfrese almost 6 years ago - 1 comment

#18 - Record: Allow to omit field names from constructor spec

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by markusschlegel almost 6 years ago - 3 comments

#17 - Remove explicit lens definition in favor of regular accessors being lenses

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by smoes almost 6 years ago

#16 - Make plain lenses into variadic functions by removing the Lens protocol

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by kaaninho almost 6 years ago

#15 - record: allow attaching compile-time metadata

Issue - State: closed - Opened by mikesperber almost 6 years ago - 1 comment

#14 - record: serialization

Issue - State: open - Opened by mikesperber almost 6 years ago

#13 - record: spec support in the default implementation

Issue - State: closed - Opened by mikesperber almost 6 years ago - 1 comment

#12 - record: optionally don't implement map protocol

Issue - State: closed - Opened by mikesperber almost 6 years ago - 1 comment

#11 - record: allow naming conversion functions from and to maps

Issue - State: open - Opened by mikesperber almost 6 years ago

#10 - record: non-generative record types

Issue - State: closed - Opened by mikesperber almost 6 years ago - 2 comments

#9 - record: optionally don't generate Java class

Issue - State: closed - Opened by mikesperber almost 6 years ago - 1 comment

#8 - record: allow overriding equality

Issue - State: closed - Opened by mikesperber almost 6 years ago - 2 comments

#7 - record: getters -> lenses

Issue - State: closed - Opened by mikesperber almost 6 years ago - 1 comment

#6 - lens: Make plain lenses into variadic functions

Issue - State: closed - Opened by mikesperber almost 6 years ago - 1 comment

#5 - record: Omit field names from constructor spec

Issue - State: closed - Opened by mikesperber almost 6 years ago

#3 - define-sum-type: Can't mix constructor and predicate on lhs of match operation.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by neshtea about 6 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: invalid

#2 - Add sum-types for clj

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by smoes about 6 years ago

#1 - Field spec should be named like selector...

Issue - State: closed - Opened by cresh about 6 years ago - 4 comments