Ecosyste.ms: Issues

An open API service for providing issue and pull request metadata for open source projects.

GitHub / WebAssembly/js-types issues and pull requests

#52 - Bump actions/download-artifact from 2 to 4.1.7 in /.github/workflows

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by dependabot[bot] about 2 months ago
Labels: dependencies

#50 - Interaction between JSPI and `WebAssembly.Function`?

Issue - State: open - Opened by hoodmane 3 months ago - 1 comment

#49 - Support reference types in spec

Pull Request - State: open - Opened by SPY 11 months ago - 2 comments

#48 - Add WebAssembly.Function.bind override to the spec

Pull Request - State: open - Opened by SPY 11 months ago

#47 - Fix for testing of WebAssembly.Function rewrapping

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by SPY 11 months ago

#46 - Bind on WebAssembly.Function

Issue - State: open - Opened by SPY about 1 year ago - 2 comments

#45 - Reference TC39 JSFunction interface instead of using a callback workaround

Pull Request - State: open - Opened by SPY about 1 year ago

#44 - Update core spec build procedure

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by SPY about 1 year ago

#43 - Port V8 tests for more coverage

Pull Request - State: open - Opened by SPY about 1 year ago - 2 comments

#42 - Adding missed parts for WebAssembly.Function to the spec.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by SPY about 1 year ago - 2 comments

#41 - Sync js-api tests from wpt.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by Ms2ger almost 2 years ago - 4 comments

#40 - Update overview to match Wasm 2.0

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by rossberg almost 2 years ago

#39 - Remove left-over test expectation

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by gahaas almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#38 - Merge recent spec changes

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by takikawa almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#37 - Adding more tests for WebAssembly.Function

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by SPY about 2 years ago - 5 comments

#36 - JS Promise integration

Issue - State: closed - Opened by fgmccabe over 2 years ago - 2 comments

#35 - Merge upstream

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by Ms2ger almost 3 years ago

#34 - Make anyfunc an alias of funcref

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by gahaas about 3 years ago - 5 comments

#34 - Make anyfunc an alias of funcref

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by gahaas about 3 years ago - 5 comments

#33 - Clear up several issues around WebAssembly.Function usage

Pull Request - State: open - Opened by tsyesika over 3 years ago - 1 comment

#32 - Editorial: Use WebIDL `constructor` operation in `Overview.md`

Pull Request - State: open - Opened by ExE-Boss over 3 years ago

#31 - Fix the type() algorithms.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by Ms2ger over 3 years ago - 2 comments

#30 - Consider how to expose reference types

Issue - State: open - Opened by Ms2ger over 3 years ago

#29 - Update to upstream.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by Ms2ger over 3 years ago - 2 comments

#28 - Allow JS functions to be directly added to via `table.set`?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by sbc100 over 3 years ago - 2 comments

#27 - Function names from WebAssembly.Function

Issue - State: closed - Opened by ghost over 3 years ago - 1 comment

#26 - Allow adding meta data

Issue - State: open - Opened by kenchris almost 4 years ago - 1 comment

#25 - Use "funcref" rather than "anyfunc"?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by Ms2ger almost 4 years ago - 1 comment

#25 - Use "funcref" rather than "anyfunc"?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by Ms2ger almost 4 years ago - 1 comment

#24 - Backwards compatability?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by ghost almost 4 years ago - 2 comments

#23 - Fix auto-publishing

Issue - State: closed - Opened by Ms2ger almost 4 years ago - 5 comments

#22 - What does the WebAssembly.Function constructor do?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by Ms2ger almost 4 years ago - 1 comment

#20 - Reference types, typed function references

Issue - State: open - Opened by lars-t-hansen about 4 years ago - 3 comments

#19 - `WebAssembly.Module.{imports,exports}`

Issue - State: closed - Opened by devsnek about 4 years ago - 3 comments

#18 - Use instance methods for type()

Issue - State: closed - Opened by Ms2ger over 4 years ago - 1 comment

#17 - [js-api] Specify changes to Module, Memory, Table and Global.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by Ms2ger over 4 years ago - 3 comments

#16 - Review implementability of WebAssembly.Function

Issue - State: open - Opened by Ms2ger over 4 years ago - 11 comments

#15 - Missing tests for subclassing WebAssembly classes

Issue - State: closed - Opened by RReverser over 4 years ago - 2 comments

#14 - Merge with upstream.

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by Ms2ger over 4 years ago - 5 comments

#13 - Passing a WasmExportedFunction to new WebAssembly.Function

Issue - State: closed - Opened by gahaas over 4 years ago - 12 comments

#12 - Clarification of WebAssembly.Function instances

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by mstarzinger about 5 years ago

#11 - Preservation of WebAssembly.Function identity upon re-export

Issue - State: closed - Opened by mstarzinger about 5 years ago - 4 comments

#10 - Fix example

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by chicoxyzzy over 5 years ago

#9 - docs(overview): Add syntax highlighting to code blocks

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by ExE-Boss over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#8 - Limits not inlined.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by aseemgarg89 over 5 years ago - 2 comments

#7 - There is no change to the Global Constructor.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by aseemgarg89 over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#4 - ExternType missing name field

Issue - State: closed - Opened by aseemgarg89 over 5 years ago - 1 comment

#3 - Rename ValueType to NumType to match naming in Reference Types, Host Bindings and GC proposals

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by chicoxyzzy almost 6 years ago - 3 comments

#2 - Update Type Representation to use actual TypeScript types

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by chicoxyzzy almost 6 years ago

#1 - Could WebAssembly.Function instead be defined in terms of the Typed Object API?

Issue - State: closed - Opened by lukewagner over 6 years ago - 3 comments