KunMinX/UnPeek-LiveData issues and pull requests

#41 - sharedViewModel和liveData导致的小bug搞得神乎其神,真是会误人子弟，还提交7个版本，真的好笑

Issue - State: open - Opened by xiong0320 8 months ago - 2 comments

#40 - 源码下载不了.

Issue - State: closed - Opened by Liforent 10 months ago - 1 comment

#39 - 没事了

Issue - State: closed - Opened by Supopo 11 months ago

#38 - 还是会发生数据倒灌

Issue - State: closed - Opened by zhaoxiuyu 12 months ago - 2 comments

#37 - service 中使用 UnPeekLiveData

Issue - State: closed - Opened by 273270381 over 1 year ago - 1 comment

#36 - 小建议：MutableResult添加扩展方法

Issue - State: open - Opened by PengShaoLei1997 almost 2 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: 精华

#35 - clear() 方法极易造成歧义, 建议更改函数名

Issue - State: closed - Opened by Joehaivo almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#34 - DialogFragment中收不到信息

Issue - State: closed - Opened by BaiMingxu almost 2 years ago - 2 comments

#33 - 一种更加简化的无入侵的 LiveData 非粘性数据解决方案

Issue - State: open - Opened by groooooomit almost 2 years ago - 2 comments
Labels: 精华

#32 - ProtectedUnPeekLiveData 中的 AtomicInteger 可以替换为 Int吧？

Issue - State: closed - Opened by Aarontaken almost 2 years ago - 1 comment

#31 - 不知从哪个版本开始不在兼容android5.1？

Issue - State: closed - Opened by SunshineMM almost 2 years ago - 1 comment

#30 - 请问未来支持 Flow 通过 asLiveData 转 LiveData 的场景吗？

Issue - State: closed - Opened by initialjie about 2 years ago - 1 comment

#29 - ViewModel has no zero argument constructor

Issue - State: closed - Opened by Lumberjack100 about 2 years ago - 2 comments

#29 - ViewModel has no zero argument constructor

Issue - State: closed - Opened by Lumberjack100 about 2 years ago - 2 comments

#28 - 是否提供默认值构造函数

Issue - State: closed - Opened by changyoutianxia about 2 years ago - 1 comment

#28 - 是否提供默认值构造函数

Issue - State: closed - Opened by changyoutianxia about 2 years ago - 1 comment

#27 - 希望增加默认值的构造函数

Issue - State: closed - Opened by changyoutianxia about 2 years ago

#27 - 希望增加默认值的构造函数

Issue - State: closed - Opened by changyoutianxia about 2 years ago

#26 - 其实根本没有所谓的数据倒灌, 我这里想做一个解释

Issue - State: closed - Opened by xiaojinzi123 over 2 years ago - 2 comments

#26 - 其实根本没有所谓的数据倒灌, 我这里想做一个解释

Issue - State: closed - Opened by xiaojinzi123 over 2 years ago - 3 comments

#25 - 倒灌问题的理解

Issue - State: closed - Opened by 3298837796 over 2 years ago - 1 comment

#25 - 倒灌问题的理解

Issue - State: closed - Opened by 3298837796 over 2 years ago - 1 comment

#24 - 其实这样就可以了，不需要包一层

Issue - State: closed - Opened by jackjustbj over 2 years ago - 1 comment

#23 - 持有Observer的activity退到后台，无法监听到事件，只有再回到前台时，才能接收到事件

Issue - State: closed - Opened by AutumnLeavesss over 2 years ago - 1 comment

#23 - 持有Observer的activity退到后台，无法监听到事件，只有再回到前台时，才能接收到事件

Issue - State: closed - Opened by AutumnLeavesss over 2 years ago - 1 comment

#22 - 这段代码写的有问题

Issue - State: closed - Opened by bingdu0 over 2 years ago - 1 comment

#21 - 7.1内存泄漏

Issue - State: open - Opened by RebornWolfman almost 3 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: 精华

#21 - 7.1内存泄漏

Issue - State: open - Opened by RebornWolfman almost 3 years ago - 6 comments
Labels: 精华

#20 - 通过自定义版本，实现防倒灌

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by RebornWolfman almost 3 years ago - 1 comment

#20 - 通过自定义版本，实现防倒灌

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by RebornWolfman almost 3 years ago - 1 comment

#19 - Add files via upload

Pull Request - State: closed - Opened by RebornWolfman almost 3 years ago

#18 - ProtectedUnPeekLiveDataV5疑问

Issue - State: closed - Opened by Lumberjack100 almost 3 years ago - 3 comments

#18 - ProtectedUnPeekLiveDataV5疑问

Issue - State: closed - Opened by Lumberjack100 almost 3 years ago - 3 comments

#17 - 写了个简版的防止倒灌，不知道行不行

Issue - State: open - Opened by RebornWolfman almost 3 years ago - 7 comments
Labels: 精华

#17 - 写了个简版的防止倒灌，不知道行不行

Issue - State: open - Opened by RebornWolfman almost 3 years ago - 7 comments
Labels: 精华

#16 - 针对使用两个ConcurrentHashMap的问题优化,可参考

Issue - State: open - Opened by liweiGe almost 3 years ago - 1 comment
Labels: 精华

#15 - 【提问须知】

Issue - State: open - Opened by KunMinX about 3 years ago - 4 comments
Labels: 提问须知

#12 - 请问什么时候迁移到maven-central呢？

Issue - State: closed - Opened by FrankyLee-dev about 3 years ago - 1 comment

#11 - ProtectedUnPeekLiveData为什么不能直接持有Observer？

Issue - State: open - Opened by wl0073921 about 3 years ago - 8 comments
Labels: 精华

#10 - 为什么要反射获取已经注册过的observer？

Issue - State: closed - Opened by wl0073921 about 3 years ago

#9 - livedata数据倒灌的，设置一个局部变量，消耗掉第一次的observe不就可以了吗？

Issue - State: closed - Opened by zhouzhihao07 about 3 years ago - 3 comments

GitHub / KunMinX/UnPeek-LiveData issues and pull requests